Tieleman v The Queen
Case
•
[2004] WASCA 285
•29 NOVEMBER 2004
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Tieleman v The Queen [2004] WASCA 285
[2004] WASCA 285
29 NOVEMBER 2004
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellant, Tieleman, sought bail pending an appeal against his conviction for drug-related offences. The application was heard by the High Court of Australia, which had to determine whether the appellant had demonstrated "exceptional reasons" to warrant bail while awaiting the appeal. The legal issue centred on whether the appellant had established a sufficient basis for being granted bail, considering the gravity of the charges and the need for the appellant to be held in custody pending the appeal. The court assessed the appellant's prospects of success on appeal, as well as other circumstances that could influence the decision. It examined whether a combination of circumstances, individually insufficient, could constitute exceptional reasons for bail. The High Court concluded that the appellant had not demonstrated exceptional reasons warranting bail, and therefore dismissed the appeal. The orders of the court were that the appeals be dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Bail
-
Prospects of Success on Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Tieleman v The Queen [2004] WASCA 285
Most Recent Citation
LMN v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] WASC 275
Cases Citing This Decision
122
Seong Won Lee and Do Young Lee v Regina
[2012] NSWSC 1168
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Cassaniti
[2006] NSWSC 1103
RT v MW
[2023] WADC 148
Cases Cited
22
Statutory Material Cited
1
Tieleman v The Queen
[2004] WASCA 164
Ribot-Cabrera v The Queen
[2004] WASCA 101
Jemielita v The Queen
[1994] HCATrans 51