Thurston and Loomis and Anor (No. 2)
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 77
•21 February 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Thurston and Loomis and Anor (No. 2) [2018] FamCA 77
[2018] FamCA 77
21 February 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Thurston and Loomis and Anor (No. 2)*, Forrest J of the Supreme Court of Western Australia was required to determine the quantum of legal costs payable by Mr Loomis to ML Lawyer. These costs were to be paid pursuant to orders previously made by the Court on 19 January 2018.
The central legal issue before the Court was to fix the precise monetary sum representing the legal costs owed by Mr Loomis to ML Lawyer. The Court also needed to determine whether interest was payable on this sum and, if so, from what date and at what rate.
Forrest J fixed the quantum of ML Lawyer's costs payable by Mr Loomis at $3,344. The Court further ordered that interest was payable on this sum at the rate prescribed by the applicable Rules of Court, commencing from 19 January 2018 and continuing until the date of payment.
The central legal issue before the Court was to fix the precise monetary sum representing the legal costs owed by Mr Loomis to ML Lawyer. The Court also needed to determine whether interest was payable on this sum and, if so, from what date and at what rate.
Forrest J fixed the quantum of ML Lawyer's costs payable by Mr Loomis at $3,344. The Court further ordered that interest was payable on this sum at the rate prescribed by the applicable Rules of Court, commencing from 19 January 2018 and continuing until the date of payment.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
2