| IN THE COURT OF APPEAL | [1996] QCA 271 |
| SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND | Appeal No. 274 of 1995 |
| Brisbane | |
| Before | Fitzgerald P. Derrington J. Mackenzie J. |
[Arndette P/L (In Liq.) v. Thurlow]
BETWEEN:
ARNDETTE PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)
(Defendant) Appellant
AND:
GREGORY JAMES THURLOW
(Plaintiff) Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT - THE COURT
Judgment delivered 20/08/1996
This is an appeal from a judgment in the Trial Division on 30 November 1995 awarding the respondent
$165,567.39, with costs to be taxed on the appropriate District Court scale. There is only one point
in the appeal, which was not seriously contested.
The respondent sued the appellant, his employer, for damages for personal injuries suffered through its
negligence, and the award included $40,000 for past economic loss. Payments of $31,404.79 had
been made by the Workers’ Compensation Board (“the Board”), all of which was paid to the
respondent except for an amount of $3,834 in respect of income tax on the compensation payments
which the Board paid to the Commissioner of Taxation. As the trial judge recognised, the respondent must repay the entire $31,404.79 to the Board from his award. In accordance with the usual practice,
the amount awarded to the respondent was increased by the amount of $3,834 income tax which the
compensation payments received by the respondent had attracted.
Before the trial judge, the appellant argued that that amount, $3,834, should not have been included in
the award, because it was demonstrated by taxation ruling IT2623 of 13 December 1990 and
correspondence which had been exchanged with the Australian Taxation Office, Townsville, that the
respondent would be entitled to a refund of that amount from the Commissioner of Taxation when the
compensation which the Board had paid was refunded to it. The trial judge was not persuaded that
the respondent would obtain such a refund, and hence concluded that he should apply the decision of
the High Court of Australia in Fox v. Wood (1981) 148 C.L.R. 438 and include the amount of tax paid
in respect of the compensation payments, i.e., $3,834, in the amount awarded to the respondent.
Before this Court, it was agreed by the parties that not only was it probable that the respondent would
receive a refund of that amount from the Commissioner of Taxation but that such a refund had already
been received.
In the circumstances of this case, therefore, the assumption upon which the judgment of Gibbs C.J., with
whom Aickin and Wilson JJ. agreed, proceeded in Fox v. Wood (see p. 442) was displaced. The
addition of the sum of $3,834 which the Board had paid to the Commissioner of Taxation to the amount
awarded to the respondent had the effect of reimbursing him for a loss which he did not sustain. It
follows that his award should be reduced by that amount: see British Transport Commission v. Gourley
[1956] A.C. 185 at p. 187, which was approved in Fox.
Accordingly, the appeal should be allowed and the judgment below in favour of the respondent reduced
by $3,834. The parties are agreed that the costs of and incidental to the appeal are to be paid by the
appellant.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
| SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND | Appeal No 274 of 1995 |
| Brisbane | |
| [Arndette P/L (In Liq.) v. Thurlow] | |
| BETWEEN: |
ARNDETTE PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)
(Defendant) Appellant
AND:
GREGORY JAMES THURLOW
(Plaintiff) Respondent FITZGERALD P. DERRINGTON J. MACKENZIE J.
Judgment delivered 20/8/1996
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT - THE COURT
1. Appeal allowed. Judgment below in favour of the respondent reduced by $3,834.00.
2. Costs of and incidental to the appeal are to be paid by the appellant, as agreed between
the parties.
| CATCHWORDS: | TAXATION - respondent suffered personal injuries through the negligence of his employer - income tax on workers’ compensation payment - Taxation Ruling IT2623 - Fox v. Wood |
| British Transport Commission v. Gourley [1956] A.C. 185 Fox v. Wood (1981) 148 C.L.R. 438 | |
| Counsel: | J.A. Griffin Q.C. with him Dr C.G.S.L. Jensen for the Appellant K.T. McCreanor for the Respondent |
| Solicitors: | MacGillivrays as t/a for Murray Lyons & Co. Gilshenan & Luton as t/a for Gayler Cleland Towne |
| Date(s) of Hearing: | 13 August 1996 |
- AGLC
- Thurlow v Arndette Pty Ltd (in liq) [1996] QCA 271
- Case
- [1996] QCA 271
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the workers’ compensation payments Thurlow received were assessable income under the statute. The ruling in Fox v Wood established that compensation payments for personal injury were not assessable income if they were received as compensation for the loss of income. However, the Taxation Ruling IT2623 provided that compensation payments were taxable if they were received for the injury itself rather than for the loss of income. The court needed to assess whether Thurlow's compensation payments fell under the category of compensation for the injury or the loss of income.
The court concluded that Thurlow's compensation payments were assessable income. It held that the payments were for the injury itself and not for the loss of income, thus falling outside the exemption provided in Fox v Wood. The court reasoned that the compensation was intended to cover the cost of the injury, not to replace lost earnings. Consequently, the compensation payments were subject to income tax. Thurlow's appeal was dismissed, and he was held liable to pay income tax on the compensation received.
The final orders of the court confirmed that Thurlow was liable for income tax on the workers’ compensation payments. The decision reinforced the distinction between compensation for loss of income and compensation for the injury itself, impacting how such payments are treated for tax purposes. This ruling clarified that compensation payments for personal injury are taxable unless explicitly exempt under the statute.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.