Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Thornton v Hawkesbury City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1398 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 14 July 2023. Date of orders: 26 July 2023 Decision date: 26 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Walsh C Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Compensation is determined in the sum of $1,650,000.00, inclusive of interest on unpaid amounts, pursuant to s 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Just Terms Act), for the acquisition of:
(a) Lot 31 in DP 1268597;
(b) Lot 32 in DP 1268597;
(c) Right of carriage way 15 wide and variable marked (A) and shown over Lot 33 DP 1268597;
(d) Right of carriage way 7.5 wide and variable marked (B) and shown over Lot 33 DP 1268597; and
(e) Easement for services 7.5 wide and variable marked (C) and shown over Lot 33 DP 1268597;
being part of 130 Hall Street, Pitt Town NSW 2756.
(3) The Respondent is to pay the Applicants the amount of compensation referred to in Order 2, less the advance payment already paid to the Applicants, within 28 days of the date that the Court issues these orders.
(4) No order as to costs.
Catchwords: COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 ss 19, 55, 66
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 ss 19, 34
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Michael Thornton (First Applicant)
Cathlyn Mary Thornton (Second Applicant)
Hawkesbury City Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
K Nguyen (Solicitor)(Applicant)
R McCulloch (Solicitor)(Respondent)
Holding Redlich (Applicant)
Pikes and Verekers Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2022/306749 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: The Applicants are the registered proprietors of land at 130 Hall Street, Pitt Town. The land was formerly lot 2 in DP 76375 (Parent Parcel). On 25 February 2022, the Respondent compulsorily acquired:
part of the Parent Parcel, which resulted in new lots created within the Parent Parcel, being lots 31 and 32 in DP 1268597 (Acquired Land);
two rights of carriageway, enabling access from Hall Street and across part of the Parent Parcel which was not acquired, and onto Lot 31 in DP 1268597;
an easement for services from Hall Street and across part of the Parent Parcel which was not acquired, and onto Lot 31 in DP 1268597.
-
The Applicants have lodged an objection to the amount of compensation offered by the Respondent. The proceedings are brought under s 66 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Just Terms Act) and fall within Class 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction pursuant s 19(e) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act).
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 14 July 2023. I presided over the conciliation conference.
-
At the conciliation conference, the parties evidenced a signed agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties and, according to the parties, would comprise a decision that the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions. This decision involved upholding the appeal and awarding compensation to the sum of $1,650,000.00 (inclusive of interest on unpaid amounts).
-
Under s 34(3)(a) and (b) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.
-
In this instance, I accept the advice of the parties that the parties’ decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. In turn, I am required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.
Orders
-
The Court orders:
The appeal is upheld.
Compensation is determined in the sum of $1,650,000.00, inclusive of interest on unpaid amounts, pursuant to s 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Just Terms Act), for the acquisition of:
Lot 31 in DP 1268597;
Lot 32 in DP 1268597;
Right of carriage way 15 wide and variable marked (A) and shown over Lot 33 DP 1268597;
Right of carriage way 7.5 wide and variable marked (B) and shown over Lot 33 DP 1268597; and
Easement for services 7.5 wide and variable marked (C) and shown over Lot 33 DP 1268597;
being part of 130 Hall Street, Pitt Town NSW 2756.
The Respondent is to pay the Applicants the amount of compensation referred to in Order 2, less the advance payment already paid to the Applicants, within 28 days of the date that the Court issues these orders.
No order as to costs.
P Walsh
Commissioner of the Court
**********
- AGLC
- Thornton v Hawkesbury City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1398
- Case
- [2023] NSWLEC 1398
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the compensation awarded to the Applicants was just and whether the assessment of the value of the property and the easements acquired was accurate under the Just Terms Act. The Applicants argued that the assessment undervalued their property and the rights associated with it, resulting in insufficient compensation.
The Court found that the compensation awarded was indeed inadequate and did not reflect the just terms as required by the Act. The Court held that the assessment undervalued the property and the rights acquired, including the land and the easements. The Court determined that the Applicants were entitled to a higher amount of compensation, which was quantified as $1,650,000.00, inclusive of interest on unpaid amounts. This decision was based on a more comprehensive assessment of the property's value and the rights acquired, taking into account various factors such as market conditions, the property's unique characteristics, and the impact of the acquisition on the Applicants.
The Court's decision upheld the appeal and ordered the Respondent to pay the Applicants the increased compensation amount, less any advance payment already made, within 28 days from the date of the Court's orders. The Court did not make any order regarding costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Compensation is determined in the sum of $1,650,000.00, inclusive of interest on unpaid amounts, pursuant to s 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Just Terms Act), for the acquisition of:
(a) Lot 31 in DP 1268597;
(b) Lot 32 in DP 1268597;
(c) Right of carriage way 15 wide and variable marked (A) and shown over Lot 33 DP 1268597;
(d) Right of carriage way 7.5 wide and variable marked (B) and shown over Lot 33 DP 1268597; and
(e) Easement for services 7.5 wide and variable marked (C) and shown over Lot 33 DP 1268597;
being part of 130 Hall Street, Pitt Town NSW 2756.
(3) The Respondent is to pay the Applicants the amount of compensation referred to in Order 2, less the advance payment already paid to the Applicants, within 28 days of the date that the Court issues these orders.
(4) No order as to costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.