Thornton and WorkCover Corporation of South Australia (No 3)

In *Thornton and WorkCover Corporation of South Australia (No 3)*, Dawe J of the Supreme Court of South Australia considered applications for costs made by both the applicant, Ms Thornton, and the respondent, the WorkCover Corporation of South Australia.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether either party was entitled to an order for costs following the determination of earlier proceedings.

Dawe J dismissed both applications for costs. The reasons for this decision are not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that neither party was successful in persuading the Court that they were entitled to recover their legal expenses.