Thomson v Glandore P/L
Case
•
[1996] QSC 260
•22 November 1996
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Thomson v Glandore P/L [1996] QSC 260
[1996] QSC 260
22 November 1996
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Thomson v. Glandore P/L involved Heather Elizabeth Thomson, the plaintiff, who filed a lawsuit against Glandore P/L (the first defendant), Noel F. Langley (the second defendant), and John R. Warren (the third defendant) on matters related to medical negligence. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants were negligent in the retention of a surgical pack in her abdomen during and after a hysterectomy.
The legal issues that the court had to decide included the extent of negligence on the part of each defendant in relation to the retention of the pack, and whether the second and third defendants were liable for contribution proceedings against the first defendant. The jury found that the second defendant was negligent in retaining the pack, while the first and third defendants were not. Furthermore, the second and third defendants were found negligent in other respects, although the third defendant was only held liable for negligently advising the operation and not for its negligent performance.
The court ruled that the plaintiff was not successful in her claim against the first defendant, but was successful against the second defendant. The plaintiff was also successful against the third defendant in other respects. The first defendant was successful in resisting the contribution proceedings brought by the second and third defendants. The court considered the plaintiff's request for a Sanderson or Bullock order in respect of costs payable to the first defendant, which was not opposed by the first defendant. The court decided that it was reasonable and proper to join the first defendant along with the second and third defendants to ensure recovery of the damages sought. The court ordered the second defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs against him, the third defendant to pay two-thirds of the plaintiff's costs against him, and the plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs. The second and third defendants were ordered to pay the first defendant's costs of the contribution proceedings.
The legal issues that the court had to decide included the extent of negligence on the part of each defendant in relation to the retention of the pack, and whether the second and third defendants were liable for contribution proceedings against the first defendant. The jury found that the second defendant was negligent in retaining the pack, while the first and third defendants were not. Furthermore, the second and third defendants were found negligent in other respects, although the third defendant was only held liable for negligently advising the operation and not for its negligent performance.
The court ruled that the plaintiff was not successful in her claim against the first defendant, but was successful against the second defendant. The plaintiff was also successful against the third defendant in other respects. The first defendant was successful in resisting the contribution proceedings brought by the second and third defendants. The court considered the plaintiff's request for a Sanderson or Bullock order in respect of costs payable to the first defendant, which was not opposed by the first defendant. The court decided that it was reasonable and proper to join the first defendant along with the second and third defendants to ensure recovery of the damages sought. The court ordered the second defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs against him, the third defendant to pay two-thirds of the plaintiff's costs against him, and the plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs. The second and third defendants were ordered to pay the first defendant's costs of the contribution proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Medical Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Breach of Contract
-
Negligence
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Limitation Periods
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Thomson v Glandore P/L [1996] QSC 260
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld)
[1953] HCA 2
Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld)
[1953] HCA 2