Thomas v Kitching
Case
•
[2020] VSC 206
•23 April 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Thomas v Kitching [2020] VSC 206
[2020] VSC 206
23 April 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, a 44-year-old Aboriginal woman, was before the Supreme Court of Victoria seeking bail in respect of charges including burglary, dishonesty offences, assaults and others. The applicant was before the court having twice been refused bail by the Magistrates' Court, which was attributed to the applicant being charged with Schedule 2 offences during a period of a community correction order. The court was required to determine whether there were exceptional circumstances warranting the applicant's release on bail and whether her release would represent an unacceptable risk of reoffending.
The court found that the applicant's significant criminal history, which included a six-year period of abstinence from offending, did not preclude the finding of exceptional circumstances. The court found that the applicant's history of illicit drug use and failure to comply with prescribed medication regimens while in custody, together with her untreated cervical bleeding and lump in her breast, were exceptional circumstances warranting bail. The court also found that the risk of reoffending was not unacceptable because the respondent did not oppose bail and the applicant had provided a personal undertaking together with strict bail conditions.
The court granted the applicant bail on her own undertaking and imposed conditions including that she reside at a specified address, comply with a curfew, submit to electronic monitoring, and refrain from consuming alcohol or illicit drugs. The applicant was also required to attend medical appointments and comply with prescribed medication regimens. The court ordered that if the applicant was ultimately convicted but not bailed, any resulting prison sentence was to be backdated to the date of her arrest.
The court found that the applicant's significant criminal history, which included a six-year period of abstinence from offending, did not preclude the finding of exceptional circumstances. The court found that the applicant's history of illicit drug use and failure to comply with prescribed medication regimens while in custody, together with her untreated cervical bleeding and lump in her breast, were exceptional circumstances warranting bail. The court also found that the risk of reoffending was not unacceptable because the respondent did not oppose bail and the applicant had provided a personal undertaking together with strict bail conditions.
The court granted the applicant bail on her own undertaking and imposed conditions including that she reside at a specified address, comply with a curfew, submit to electronic monitoring, and refrain from consuming alcohol or illicit drugs. The applicant was also required to attend medical appointments and comply with prescribed medication regimens. The court ordered that if the applicant was ultimately convicted but not bailed, any resulting prison sentence was to be backdated to the date of her arrest.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
-
Bail Application
-
Exceptional Circumstances
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Thomas v Kitching [2020] VSC 206
Most Recent Citation
Re Sidi [2021] VSC 759
Cases Citing This Decision
22
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Saadieh
[2021] NSWSC 1186
Daniel Zampatti v The Queen
[2020] VSCA 285
Daniel Zampatti v The Queen
[2020] VSCA 264
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
0
Re Kennedy
[2020] VSC 187
Re Broes
[2020] VSC 128
Re Lado
[2020] VSC 132