THOMAS & HOGAN

In *Thomas & Hogan*, the parties sought consent orders from the Court.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether to approve the consent orders as sought by the parties.

Judge Jarrett refused the application, indicating that the Court was not satisfied that the proposed orders were appropriate. While the specific reasons for this dissatisfaction are not detailed in the provided text, the refusal signifies that the Court exercised its discretion to decline making the consent orders.

Consequently, the Court's order was that the parties' application for the Court to make orders by consent is refused.