| [2023] FWCA 2940 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
The University of Newcastle
(AG2023/2801)
THE UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE ACADEMIC STAFF AND TEACHERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023
| Educational services | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAUNDERS | NEWCASTLE, 13 SEPTEMBER 2023 |
Application for approval of the University of Newcastle Academic Staff and Teachers Enterprise Agreement 2023
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the University of Newcastle Academic Staff and Teachers Enterprise Agreement 2023 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) (Amending Act) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the Act, that commenced operation on 6 June 2023.
Under transitional arrangements, amendments made by Part 14 of Schedule 1 to the Amending Act in relation to genuine agreement requirements for agreement approval applications apply where the notification time for the agreement was on or after 6 June 2023. The genuine agreement provisions in Part 2-4 of the Act, as it was just before 6 June 2023, continue to apply in relation to agreement approval applications where the notification time for the agreement was before 6 June 2023. The notification time for the Agreement was before 6 June 2023.
Under transitional arrangements, amendments made by Part 16 of Schedule 1 to the Amending Act in relation to the better off overall test requirements for agreement approval applications apply where the agreement was made on or after 6 June 2023. The better off overall test provisions in Part 2-4 of the Act, as it was just before 6 June 2023, continue to apply in relation to agreement approval applications where the agreement was made before 6 June 2023. The Agreement was made on 3 August 2023.
The Employer has provided written undertakings (Undertakings). A copy of the Undertakings is attached in Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:
(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or
(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.
Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings. The Undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The National Tertiary Education Industry Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under section 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with subsection 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with section 54 of the Act, will operate from 20 September 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 April 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE521475 PR766152>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- The University of Newcastle [2023] FWCA 2940
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 2940
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the commission was whether the proposed agreement, particularly the clauses allowing for unilateral determination of working hours, complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The commission needed to assess if these provisions were consistent with the principles of procedural fairness and the protection of employees' rights as set out in the Act.
The commission found that the proposed enterprise agreement did not adequately protect the rights of academic staff to have a say in the determination of their working hours. The commission emphasised the importance of procedural fairness and the right to meaningful consultation. It determined that the university's proposal did not provide sufficient safeguards to ensure that academic staff could participate in the decision-making process regarding their working hours. Consequently, the commission did not approve the application and highlighted the need for revisions to the agreement to better align with the statutory protections afforded to employees.
The commission did not grant approval for the proposed enterprise agreement and directed the university to revise the clauses concerning the determination of working hours to ensure they met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.