[2014] FWCA 2693 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (Q.)
(AG2014/917)
BLUE CARE/WESLEY MISSION BRISBANE ALLIED HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICE STREAM EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Social, community, home care and disability services | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 24 APRIL 2014 |
Application for approval of the Blue Care/Wesley Mission Brisbane Allied Health and Community Service Stream Employees Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Blue Care/Wesley Mission Brisbane Allied Health and Community Service Stream Employees Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (Q.). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Together Queensland Industrial Union of Employees and the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union, being the bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[4] The agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE407828 PR549935>
- AGLC
- The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (Q.) [2014] FWCA 2693
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 2693
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Commission had to address were whether the agreement met the requirements for "genuine agreement" as per section 230 of the Act, and whether it adhered to the "better off overall test" stipulated in section 232 of the Act. This involved scrutinising whether the agreement was negotiated in good faith and whether it provided employees with outcomes no less favourable than the applicable award or safety net. The Commission also had to consider if the agreement contained provisions that were contrary to public policy or were otherwise invalid.
In deliberating on these issues, the Commission examined the negotiation process, the content of the agreement, and its compliance with the statutory framework. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and that it provided employees with outcomes that were no less favourable than the relevant award or safety net. The Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and appropriate for approval, taking into account the specific needs and circumstances of the employees covered by the agreement. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, finding it met all the necessary statutory requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.