[2013] FWCA 9722 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
The trustee for The Boyle Family Trust T/A DMI Electrical
(AG2013/11077)
DMI ELECTRICAL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT - 2013/2016
Electrical contracting industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 12 DECEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the DMI Electrical Enterprise Agreement - 2013/2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the DMI Electrical Enterprise Agreement - 2013/2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by The trustee for The Boyle Family Trust T/A DMI Electrical. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 12 December 2013 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 19 December 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE405822 PR545570>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- The trustee for The Boyle Family Trust T/A DMI Electrical [2013] FWCA 9722
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9722
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically sections 230 and 231, which require enterprise agreements to meet certain criteria, including the absence of provisions that would allow for unfair dismissals or underpayment of employees. The ETUA argued that the agreement failed to adequately protect employee entitlements, while DMI Electrical contended that the agreement was fair and reasonable.
In its decision, the FWC examined the terms of the agreement and the submissions of both parties. The Commission found that while the agreement contained some provisions that could potentially lead to unfair dismissals, these were not so significant as to render the agreement invalid. The FWC noted that the agreement included standard protections and provisions that aligned with the objectives of the Fair Work Act, including mechanisms for resolving disputes and ensuring fair treatment of employees. The Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable overall and approved it under the Act.
The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the DMI Electrical Enterprise Agreement - 2013/2016, with the conditions that the agreement be registered by the Registrar of the Fair Work Commission and that it come into effect from the date of the decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.