[2013] FWCA 7320 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
The Trustee for Hunts Family Trust T/A Storm Scaffolding
(AG2013/9191)
STORM SCAFFOLDING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 23 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Storm Scaffolding Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 5 September 2013 by The Trustee for Hunts Family Trust T/A Storm Scaffolding for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Storm Scaffolding Enterprise Agreement 2013 (“the Agreement”).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] On 18 September 2013 the Employer provided two undertakings to the Fair Work Commission. These undertakings are attached to and taken to be terms of the Agreement.
[4] In light of the Employer’s undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE404279 PR542332>
- AGLC
- The Trustee for Hunts Family Trust T/A Storm Scaffolding [2013] FWCA 7320
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7320
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the FWC were primarily whether the agreement provided for the terms and conditions of employment that were fair and portable and whether it complied with the procedural requirements for approval. The applicant argued that the agreement was fair and met the necessary standards, while the CFMEU contended that certain provisions of the agreement did not comply with the legislative requirements and were not in the best interests of the employees.
The FWC assessed the agreement against the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act, focusing on whether it provided for fair and portable terms and conditions and whether it complied with the procedural requirements for approval. The Commission found that while most of the agreement was compliant, certain provisions regarding shift penalties and the calculation of overtime were not fully aligned with the legislative framework. Despite these issues, the FWC determined that the overall agreement was fair and portable, and granted approval, noting the procedural fairness observed in its development.
The final orders of the FWC were that the Storm Scaffolding Enterprise Agreement 2013 be approved with the modifications necessary to bring it into compliance with the Fair Work Act, including specific adjustments to the provisions on shift penalties and overtime calculations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.