The State of Western Australia v Fleming

Case

[2010] WASCA 162

5 AUGUST 2010


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
The State of Western Australia v Fleming [2010] WASCA 162 [2010] WASCA 162 5 AUGUST 2010

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The State of Western Australia appealed against the sentence imposed on the respondent, who had been found guilty of possessing a prohibited drug with intent to sell or supply to another, and of assaulting a public officer. The appeal was heard in the Court of Appeal of Western Australia. The State argued that the sentence of 16 months' imprisonment for the drug offence and 10 months' imprisonment for the assault offence, to be served concurrently, was manifestly inadequate.

The court considered whether the sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate. The primary judge had considered the respondent's background, which included a history of drug use and offending, but had also taken into account the fact that the respondent had shown some remorse and had agreed to participate in a rehabilitation program. The court acknowledged that the respondent's background was relevant to the sentencing process, but held that it was not the only consideration. The court held that the primary judge had failed to give adequate weight to the seriousness of the offences, and to the need to deter the respondent and others from engaging in similar conduct.

The court re-sentenced the respondent to a total effective sentence of 2 years' imprisonment, to be served consecutively. The court held that the drug offence was a serious one, and that the assault offence demonstrated a high degree of culpability. The court held that the sentence imposed by the primary judge did not adequately reflect the seriousness of the offences, or the need to deter the respondent and others from engaging in similar conduct. The court held that a sentence of immediate imprisonment was appropriate, and that the total effective sentence should be 2 years' imprisonment.

The court's final orders were that the appeal be allowed, the convictions be affirmed, and the respondent be re-sentenced to a total effective sentence of 2 years' imprisonment, to be served consecutively. The respondent was given 28 days to lodge an application for leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Criminal Liability

  • Sentencing

  • Possession of a prohibited drug with intent to sell or supply to another

  • Assaulting a public officer

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

20

Nell v The Queen [2014] WASCA 193
Cases Cited

22

Statutory Material Cited

1

Nelis v The Queen [2000] WASCA 194
Watt v The Queen [2000] WASCA 354