The State of Western Australia v Campbell
Case
•
[2016] WASC 177
•15 JUNE 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
The State of Western Australia v Campbell [2016] WASC 177
[2016] WASC 177
15 JUNE 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The State of Western Australia filed an application in the Supreme Court of Western Australia against Campbell, who was facing criminal charges. The applicant sought a separate trial on the basis that evidence only admissible against co-accused would prejudice the applicant if tried jointly. The court had to decide whether any prejudice to the applicant could be guarded against by the trial judge's directions to the jury. The court considered whether the prejudice to the applicant would be significant, and if the prejudice could be mitigated by directions to the jury. It was noted that the court has a discretion under section 133(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act 2004 (WA) to order a separate trial if it is satisfied that a fair trial cannot be achieved. The court held that the prejudice to the applicant was not significant enough to warrant a separate trial. The court also held that any prejudice could be guarded against by directions to the jury. The application for a separate trial was therefore refused. The court did not make any orders in relation to the application.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Abuse of Process
-
Jurisdiction
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
The State of Western Australia v Herbert [No 2] [2016] WASC 222
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Campbell v The State of Western Australia
[2016] WASCA 156
The State of Western Australia v Herbert [No 2]
[2016] WASC 222
Campbell v The State of Western Australia
[2016] WASCA 156
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
1
Webb v the Queen
[1994] HCA 30
The State of Western Australia v Bowen
[2006] WASCA 133
Webb v the Queen
[1994] HCA 30