The Star Entertainment Qld Limited v Yew Choy Wong
Case
•
[2021] QSC 67
•31 March 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
The Star Entertainment Qld Limited v Yew Choy Wong [2021] QSC 67
[2021] QSC 67
31 March 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Star Entertainment Qld Limited sought to recover damages from Dr Yew Choy Wong for the dishonour of a cheque presented to the casino. Dr Wong sought to have the proceeding dismissed on the basis that it lacked prospects of success and was vexatious or oppressive, and would bring the administration of justice into disrepute. The court considered whether the plaintiff's claim had sufficient prospects of success to warrant putting the defendant to the time, expense and trouble of defending it, and whether the proceeding was vexatious or oppressive or would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
The court found that the plaintiff had a good arguable case and that the proceeding had an obvious and substantial connection to the jurisdiction. The court found that Dr Wong was not at risk of injustice if the proceeding continued and that dismissing or staying the proceeding would be an injustice. The court found that the proceeding was not vexatious or oppressive and would not bring the administration of justice into disrepute. The court found that Dr Wong's conduct in Singapore did not amount to forum shopping and that there was no evidence of the plaintiff causing delay, undue expense or injustice by tactical manoeuvring.
The court dismissed the application and ordered the parties to file and serve written submissions on the costs of the application, not exceeding five pages, within 14 days.
The court found that the plaintiff had a good arguable case and that the proceeding had an obvious and substantial connection to the jurisdiction. The court found that Dr Wong was not at risk of injustice if the proceeding continued and that dismissing or staying the proceeding would be an injustice. The court found that the proceeding was not vexatious or oppressive and would not bring the administration of justice into disrepute. The court found that Dr Wong's conduct in Singapore did not amount to forum shopping and that there was no evidence of the plaintiff causing delay, undue expense or injustice by tactical manoeuvring.
The court dismissed the application and ordered the parties to file and serve written submissions on the costs of the application, not exceeding five pages, within 14 days.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
-
Private International Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Res Judicata
-
Abuse of Process
-
Forum Shopping
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Sportec Pty Ltd v Leatherman Tool Group Inc [2024] QDC 188
Cases Citing This Decision
6
The Star Entertainment Qld Limited v Wong
[2021] QSC 81
Sportec Pty Ltd v Leatherman Tool Group Inc
[2024] QDC 188
Wong v Star Entertainment Qld Limited
[2021] QCA 277
Cases Cited
25
Statutory Material Cited
3
Azzi v Fox Fire Security System L.L.C
[2020] NSWSC 331
Agar v Hyde
[2000] HCA 41