The Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees' Association of Western Australia v Samuel Gance (ABN 50 577 312 446) T/A Chemist Warehouse Perth
Case
•
[2020] WASCA 36
•24 MARCH 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
The Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees' Association of Western Australia v Samuel Gance (ABN 50 577 312 446) T/A Chemist Warehouse Perth [2020] WASCA 36
[2020] WASCA 36
24 MARCH 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees' Association of Western Australia sought an appeal against a decision of the Full Bench of the Industrial Relations Commission. The Full Bench had issued a declaration that the association was not entitled to be paid for time spent on protected industrial action. The association sought a stay of the declaration pending the outcome of the appeal. The court was required to determine whether the association was entitled to a stay of the declaration and whether the court had the jurisdiction to grant such a stay.
The court considered the powers of the court to grant a stay of proceedings under the relevant legislation. The court noted that the power to grant a stay was discretionary and that the applicant must demonstrate special or exceptional circumstances to obtain a stay. The court also noted that there was a distinction between staying an order and staying proceedings under the order. The court found that the power to grant a stay was limited and that it should be exercised with caution. The court also considered the nature of the declaration and found that it was unlikely that a declaration could be stayed in the absence of a statutory power to do so.
The court found that the association had not demonstrated special or exceptional circumstances to warrant a stay of the declaration. The court also found that the power to grant a stay did not extend to declaratory orders. The court dismissed the application for a stay of the declaration.
The court dismissed the application for a stay of the declaration and made no order as to costs.
The court considered the powers of the court to grant a stay of proceedings under the relevant legislation. The court noted that the power to grant a stay was discretionary and that the applicant must demonstrate special or exceptional circumstances to obtain a stay. The court also noted that there was a distinction between staying an order and staying proceedings under the order. The court found that the power to grant a stay was limited and that it should be exercised with caution. The court also considered the nature of the declaration and found that it was unlikely that a declaration could be stayed in the absence of a statutory power to do so.
The court found that the association had not demonstrated special or exceptional circumstances to warrant a stay of the declaration. The court also found that the power to grant a stay did not extend to declaratory orders. The court dismissed the application for a stay of the declaration.
The court dismissed the application for a stay of the declaration and made no order as to costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Special or Exceptional Circumstances
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
AIS Pub Group Pty Ltd T/A Paddy Malones v Ms Madeline Doe [2024] FWC 2082
Cases Citing This Decision
6
A v Minister for Corrective Services
[2022] WASCA 146
The Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees' Association of Western Australia v Samuel Gance T/A Chemist Warehouse Perth [No 2]
[2021] WASCA 76
AIS Pub Group Pty Ltd T/A Paddy Malones v Ms Madeline Doe
[2024] FWC 2082
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
2