[2013] FWCA 4662 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
The Salvation Army South Australian Division
(AG2013/1840)
THE SALVATION ARMY - LINSELL LODGE NURSING EMPLOYEES (AGED CARE) & ANF ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 12 JULY 2013 |
Application for approval of The Salvation Army - Linsell Lodge Nursing Employees (Aged Care) & ANF Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the The Salvation Army - Linsell Lodge Nursing Employees (Aged Care) & ANF Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by The Salvation Army South Australian Division. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Nursing Federation, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 19 July 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 July 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE402364 PR538892>
- AGLC
- The Salvation Army South Australian Division [2013] FWCA 4662
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4662
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The principal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement was in the public interest, as required by section 232(2)(b) of the Act. The Commission found that the agreement was in the public interest, because the terms were fair and reasonable and met the requirements of the Act. The Commission also found that the agreement met the requirements of section 230(1)(a) of the Act, because it was a registered agreement. The Commission found that the agreement was also fair and reasonable in all its terms, as required by section 230(1)(b) of the Act. The Commission found that the agreement met the requirements of section 230 of the Act.
The Commission approved the terms of the agreement. The Commission found that the agreement was in the public interest and met all the requirements of the Act. The terms of the agreement were approved on 19 November 2012. The Commission made an order approving the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.