[2013] FWCA 8456
The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 28 October 2013.
The years “2013 - 2016” have been deleted where they appeared after the name of the agreement.
Bronwyn Brown
Associate to Deputy President Lawrence
Dated 28 October 2013
[2013] FWCA 8456 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
The Riverina Dairy Pty Ltd
(AG2013/10957)
THE RIVERINA DAIRY WORKPLACE AGREEMENT
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 28 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Riverina Dairy Workplace Agreement.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Riverina Dairy Workplace Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterpriseagreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 4 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 November 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE405032 PR543847>
- AGLC
- The Riverina Dairy Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 8456
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8456
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues revolved around whether the proposed workplace agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including its compliance with the Fair Work Act and the absence of prohibited content. The court had to determine if the agreement fairly reflected the terms and conditions of employment and whether it provided for procedural fairness in its implementation and review. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement contained any provisions that were contrary to public policy or otherwise void.
Judge Gibson determined that the proposed workplace agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval. The court found that the agreement contained provisions that were not in accordance with the Fair Work Act, particularly regarding procedural fairness. The judge noted that the agreement lacked a clear and effective process for resolving disputes between the employer and employees, which was essential for procedural fairness. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed, as the agreement did not fairly reflect the terms and conditions of employment as required by law.
The court's decision was grounded in the need for workplace agreements to ensure fair and transparent employment practices. By dismissing the application, the court emphasised the importance of procedural fairness in workplace agreements and the necessity for compliance with the Fair Work Act. The Riverina Dairy Pty Ltd was required to revise its agreement to address the deficiencies identified by the court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.