The Queen v Alice-May Kane
Case
•
[2015] ACTSC 46
•19 February 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
The Queen v Alice-May Kane [2015] ACTSC 46
[2015] ACTSC 46
19 February 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the ACT Supreme Court, the matter of The Queen v Alice-May Kane was heard, concerning the breach of a good behaviour order made on 20 November 2012. The respondent, Alice-May Kane, was required to report for supervision but failed to do so. This led to a charge of breach of the order, with the respondent seeking rehabilitation through an alternative program. The central legal issue the court needed to address was whether the respondent had indeed breached the terms of the good behaviour order and, if so, what appropriate remedy should be applied.
The court examined the evidence presented and found that the respondent had indeed failed to comply with the reporting requirements of the good behaviour order. The court considered the respondent's history of non-compliance and her need for rehabilitation, and it found that a simple continuation of the existing order was not sufficient. The court determined that an extension of the order for another 12 months was necessary, along with the addition of a new condition requiring the respondent to admit herself to the Karralika Therapeutic Community and follow all reasonable directions of the program's officer in charge. If the respondent left or was discharged from the program before completion, she was required to report to the ACT Supreme Court within 48 hours to reconsider the terms of the order.
Based on its findings, the court issued an order extending the good behaviour order for a further 12 months, with the additional condition requiring the respondent to participate in the Karralika Therapeutic Community. The court's decision aimed to provide the respondent with a structured rehabilitation pathway while ensuring compliance with the terms of the order.
The court examined the evidence presented and found that the respondent had indeed failed to comply with the reporting requirements of the good behaviour order. The court considered the respondent's history of non-compliance and her need for rehabilitation, and it found that a simple continuation of the existing order was not sufficient. The court determined that an extension of the order for another 12 months was necessary, along with the addition of a new condition requiring the respondent to admit herself to the Karralika Therapeutic Community and follow all reasonable directions of the program's officer in charge. If the respondent left or was discharged from the program before completion, she was required to report to the ACT Supreme Court within 48 hours to reconsider the terms of the order.
Based on its findings, the court issued an order extending the good behaviour order for a further 12 months, with the additional condition requiring the respondent to participate in the Karralika Therapeutic Community. The court's decision aimed to provide the respondent with a structured rehabilitation pathway while ensuring compliance with the terms of the order.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Breach of Contract
-
Specific Performance
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Director of Public Prosecutions v Brooks (a pseudonym) [2025] ACTSC 45
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Clarke v Commissioner for Social Housing
[2016] ACAT 148
Director of Public Prosecutions v Brooks (a pseudonym)
[2025] ACTSC 45
Clarke v Commissioner for Social Housing
[2016] ACAT 148
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1