The Owners - Strata Plan No. 568 v Levitin; Levitin v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 568
Case
•
[2021] NSWCATCD 65
•08 February 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
The Owners - Strata Plan No. 568 v Levitin; Levitin v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 568 [2021] NSWCATCD 65
[2021] NSWCATCD 65
08 February 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Owners of Strata Plan No. 568 brought proceedings against Levitin, the owner of Lot 2 in the strata scheme, and vice versa, in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT). The dispute concerned the management of common property within the strata scheme and the appointment of a strata manager. The Owners sought to implement a by-law to address the state of disrepair of common property, and Levitin sought the compulsory appointment of a strata manager.
The key legal issues were whether the refusal of the proposed by-law was unreasonable and whether the compulsory appointment of a strata manager should occur. In relation to the by-law, the tribunal found that the refusal was unreasonable, as it was necessary to address the state of disrepair and the lack of compliance with the body corporate’s by-laws. Regarding the compulsory appointment of a strata manager, the tribunal found that there was no evidence of deadlock or mismanagement that warranted such an appointment.
The tribunal prescribed the making of the by-law and ordered the Owners to register it with the Registrar-General. The tribunal dismissed the Owners’ application for the restoration of common property and Levitin’s application for compulsory appointment of a strata manager. Any costs application was to be made within 14 days of the decision.
The key legal issues were whether the refusal of the proposed by-law was unreasonable and whether the compulsory appointment of a strata manager should occur. In relation to the by-law, the tribunal found that the refusal was unreasonable, as it was necessary to address the state of disrepair and the lack of compliance with the body corporate’s by-laws. Regarding the compulsory appointment of a strata manager, the tribunal found that there was no evidence of deadlock or mismanagement that warranted such an appointment.
The tribunal prescribed the making of the by-law and ordered the Owners to register it with the Registrar-General. The tribunal dismissed the Owners’ application for the restoration of common property and Levitin’s application for compulsory appointment of a strata manager. Any costs application was to be made within 14 days of the decision.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Compulsory Appointment
-
Common Property Rights
-
By-law
-
Registration of By-law
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
4
Capcelea v The Owners - Strata Plan No 48887
[2019] NSWCATCD 27
Hoare and Ors v The Owners-Strata Plan No 73905
[2018] NSWCATCD 45
Roseby v The Owners - Strata Plan No 2400
[2018] NSWCATCD 72