| [2024] FWCA 1565 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
The Outdoor Education Group
(AG2024/1111)
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE OUTDOOR EDUCATION GROUP ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024
| Miscellaneous | |
| COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 29 APRIL 2024 |
Application for approval of the Outdoor Education Group Enterprise Agreement 2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Outdoor Education Group Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Outdoor Education Group. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 May 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 29 April 2028.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE524436 PR774328>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- The Outdoor Education Group [2024] FWCA 1565
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 1565
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved determining whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, whether it was free from coercion and undue influence, and whether it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also had to assess whether the agreement contained any terms that were inconsistent with the National Employment Standards or the applicable awards.
In assessing the application, the Commission examined the submissions and evidence provided by both parties. The Commission considered the nature of the work performed by the employees, the bargaining positions of the parties, and the broader economic context. The Commission found that the proposed agreement contained terms that were fair and reasonable, provided that certain amendments were made to address the respondents' concerns. The Commission made orders approving the agreement with the specified amendments, ensuring that it complied with the statutory requirements for approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.