The Mary Potter Nursing Home and Ethel Forrest Day Care Centre Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 7993


[2013] FWCA 7993

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

The Mary Potter Nursing Home and Ethel Forrest Day Care Centre Pty Ltd
(AG2013/9399)

THE FORREST CENTRE, COMMUNITY SERVICES, CASE WORKERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Social, community, home care and disability services

COMMISSIONER JOHNS

MELBOURNE, 14 OCTOBER 2013

Application for approval of The Forrest Centre, Community Services, Case Workers Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] On 13 September 2013 an application was made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as The Forrest Centre, Community Services, Case Workers Enterprise Agreement 2013 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) by The Mary Potter Nursing Home and Ethel Forrest Day Care Centre Pty Ltd (Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Agreement was lodged outside the 14 day timeframe prescribed by s 185(3)(a) of the Act. In the covering email to the application, the Applicant’s representative advised the application was lodged late due to difficulties in obtaining employee representative signatures on the Agreement. The issue was compounded when the Applicant’s representative responsible for lodging the application was absent from work due to illness. In all the circumstances the Commission considers it fair to extent the period for lodgement and does so pursuant to section 185(3)(b).

[3] The Commission is satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 21 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE404731  PR543171>

Details
AGLC
The Mary Potter Nursing Home and Ethel Forrest Day Care Centre Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 7993
Case
[2013] FWCA 7993
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Mary Potter Nursing Home and Ethel Forrest Day Care Centre Pty Ltd involved a dispute concerning the approval of a new enterprise agreement. The matter was brought before the Fair Work Commission, Australia’s independent national workplace relations tribunal. The central issue was whether the agreement, which was proposed by the applicant, complied with the necessary legal requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The legal issues before the Commission centred around the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under Section 231. This included whether the agreement facilitated the efficient and productive operation of the enterprise and whether it included provisions that ensure fair and reasonable terms of employment for the employees. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement allowed for the proper and efficient operation of the enterprise.

The Commission found that the proposed agreement met all the statutory requirements for approval. The agreement facilitated the efficient and productive operation of the enterprise, and it included provisions that ensured fair and reasonable terms of employment for the employees. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for the proper and efficient operation of the enterprise, and therefore, the application was approved. The decision was made on the basis that the agreement was beneficial for both the employer and the employees, promoting a productive and harmonious workplace.

The final orders of the Commission were that the Community Services, Case Workers Enterprise Agreement 2013 be approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. This approval was subject to the conditions and limitations specified in the agreement and as required by the Act. The Commission further ordered that the agreement be registered and published on the Fair Work Commission's website.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.