The King David School Holdings Ltd T/A The King David School

Case [2013] FWCA 9304


[2013] FWCA 9304

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

The King David School Holdings Ltd T/A The King David School
(AG2013/10161)

THE KING DAVID SCHOOL TEACHERS AGREEMENT 2013 - 2016

Educational services

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 28 NOVEMBER 2013

Application for approval of The King David School Teachers Agreement 2013 - 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as The King David School Teachers Agreement 2013 - 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Independent Education Union of Australia, Victoria Tasmania Branch, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54 of the Act it will operate from 5 December 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 January 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE405570  PR545025>

Details
AGLC
The King David School Holdings Ltd T/A The King David School [2013] FWCA 9304
Case
[2013] FWCA 9304
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The King David School Holdings Ltd, trading as The King David School, sought approval for the Teachers Agreement 2013 - 2016. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission, as the Commission has the authority to approve enterprise agreements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The primary dispute centred on whether the proposed agreement met the necessary criteria for approval, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it adhered to the good faith bargaining requirements.

The key legal issues for the Commission to decide were whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the teachers, and if there was genuine bargaining between the parties. The Commission had to examine the content of the agreement, the process of bargaining, and the circumstances surrounding the negotiation to determine if the agreement met the statutory requirements. The Commission also had to consider the impact of the agreement on the teachers and the school, and whether the agreement promoted harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relationships.

The Fair Work Commission approved the agreement, finding that it met the necessary criteria for approval. The Commission determined that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the teachers, and that the bargaining process was genuine. The Commission found that the agreement promoted harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relationships, and that it did not have an adverse effect on the teachers or the school. The Commission also found that the agreement did not contravene any provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The Commission approved the Teachers Agreement 2013 - 2016, effective from the date of the Commission's decision. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission, and it would be binding on all parties subject to the agreement. The Commission's decision brought finality to the dispute and provided certainty for both the teachers and the school.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.