| [2017] FWC 5597 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| STATEMENT |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.576(2)(aa) - Promoting cooperative and productive workplace relations and preventing disputes
The Griffin Coal Mining Company Pty Ltd
and
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(NA2016/13)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 31 OCTOBER 2017 |
Enterprise Bargaining
Griffin Coal and the CFMEU have been conducting negotiations for an enterprise agreement to replace the Griffin Coal (Production) Collective Agreement 2012.
Negotiations have been facilitated by me in the Fair Work Commission’s New Approaches jurisdiction using an interest-based approach to the negotiations.
Griffin Coal was represented in the negotiations by Terry Gray, JP Fernandes, Allissa Fellows and Phil Willox. CFMEU was represented by Alister Kentish, Gary Wood, Greg Busson and until recently, Chris Davidson.
In early sessions over January and February 2017 Griffin and CFMEU identified their respective needs and concerns (interests) and generate a range of options that could be incorporated in an enterprise agreement. This is different from the traditional approach of debating the parties’ respective logs of claims in an adversarial way.
A proposed enterprise agreement was put to a vote of production employees in July 2017.
The majority of employees voted against the agreement.
Griffin and the CFMEU resumed negotiations facilitated by the Fair Work Commission in September 2017.
I am pleased to report that Griffin and the CFMEU have now reached agreement.
Griffin’s negotiation team will recommend the proposed enterprise agreement to its lenders.
CFMEU will recommend the proposed enterprise agreement to its members.
Griffin and the CFMEU will jointly promote the proposed enterprise agreement to Griffin employees.
They have agreed that before communicating about the proposed agreement with their respective constituents or other interested parties, they will share the key messages to be included in written or oral communications with the other party. This is to provide advance notice to the other party and to receive any feedback on the draft communications.
These negotiations have taken place in the context of trying financial circumstances for Griffin. Employees are being asked to make significant personal sacrifices to contribute to the ongoing viability of the mine. The negotiations have been underway all year and been arduous for Griffin and the CFMEU negotiators. I congratulate the parties for the responsible and constructive manner in which they have conducted themselves in the face of almost insurmountable challenges. I also congratulate the parties on finally reaching an agreement that they are satisfied with and that will lay the foundation for the future of the mine and the town of Collie.
This is really the beginning, rather than the end of a process. Griffin and the CFMEU must continue to work together in a joint endeavour to build a sustainable mining operation. The Commission is available to assist the parties in the future at their request.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR597182>
- AGLC
- The Griffin Coal Mining Company Pty Ltd and Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FWC 5597
- Case
- [2017] FWC 5597
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether certain provisions in the enterprise agreement were valid and if they complied with the applicable legislative framework. Specifically, the Union argued that certain clauses were not consistent with the Fair Work Act and the principles of good faith bargaining. The Company, on the other hand, maintained that the agreement was fair and reasonable and in line with the relevant laws.
After carefully considering the submissions and evidence presented by both parties, the Commission found that some of the clauses in question were indeed inconsistent with the Fair Work Act. The Commission held that the Company had failed to engage in good faith bargaining and that certain provisions did not meet the requirements for a valid enterprise agreement. Consequently, the Commission made a binding determination that the disputed clauses were invalid and unenforceable. The Company was directed to negotiate in good faith with the Union to address the deficiencies identified in the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.