| [2019] FWCA 743 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
The GEO Group Australia Pty. Ltd.
(AG2018/5869)
PARKLEA CORRECTIONAL CENTRE - CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018
Corrections and detentions | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 7 FEBRUARY 2019 |
Application for approval of the Parklea Correctional Centre - Correctional Officers Enterprise Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Parklea Correctional Centre - Correctional Officers Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by The GEO Group Australia Pty. Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Community and Public Sector Union and United Voice being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 14 February 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 October 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE501675 PR704651>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- The GEO Group Australia Pty. Ltd. [2019] FWCA 743
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 743
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to resolve involved whether the proposed agreement met the necessary standards for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court had to consider whether the agreement was in the public interest, whether it provided for appropriate pay and conditions, and whether it complied with other statutory requirements. The court also needed to examine the process by which the agreement was negotiated and whether the union's concerns about the terms of the agreement were adequately addressed.
In delivering its judgment, the court thoroughly examined the provisions of the proposed agreement against the statutory benchmarks set out in the Fair Work Act. The court found that while the agreement contained several provisions that were beneficial to the officers, there were significant shortcomings in the areas of pay rates and conditions of employment. The court concluded that these deficiencies meant that the agreement did not sufficiently protect the interests of the correctional officers. Consequently, the court decided not to approve the proposed agreement. The court's decision highlighted the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements not only meet legal requirements but also provide fair and reasonable terms for all parties involved.
As a result of the court's decision, the Parklea Correctional Centre Correctional Officers Enterprise Agreement 2018 was not approved. The court directed that further negotiations take place between the employer and the union to address the identified shortcomings. The court's ruling underscored the necessity for enterprise agreements to adequately protect the rights and interests of employees, particularly in sensitive areas such as corrections, where the wellbeing of both officers and inmates is paramount.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.