| [2021] FWCA 2955 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
The Engineering Company Pty Ltd T/A The Engineering Company
(AG2021/5133)
THE ENGINEERING COMPANY WORKPLACE AGREEMENT 2021
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 21 MAY 2021 |
Application for approval of The Engineering Company Workplace Agreement 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as The Engineering Company Workplace Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by The Engineering Company Pty Ltd T/A The Engineering Company. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 May 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE511575 PR730090>
- AGLC
- The Engineering Company Pty Ltd T/A The Engineering Company [2021] FWCA 2955
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 2955
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court had to address included whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to provisions concerning minimum wage rates, penalty rates, and other employment conditions. The court also had to consider whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided fair terms and conditions of employment. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement satisfied the requirements for being a single-enterprise agreement and whether it provided for an appropriate process for resolving disputes.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement did not meet the requirements for approval. The court identified several deficiencies in the agreement, including inadequate provisions for minimum wage rates and failure to provide for adequate penalty rates. Furthermore, the court determined that the agreement did not adequately address the process for resolving disputes. As a result, the application for approval of the agreement was dismissed. The Commission ordered that the proposed agreement be returned to the parties for amendment and resubmission, if appropriate.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.