| [2018] FWCA 7404 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
The Duct Company Pty Ltd
(AG2018/2906)
“THE DUCT COMPANY” ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION HVAC WORKERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT FOR NSW 2015-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 6 DECEMBER 2018 |
Application for variation of the “The Duct Company” On-Site Construction HVAC Workers Enterprise Agreement for NSW 2015-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the “The Duct Company” On-Site Construction HVAC Workers Enterprise Agreement for NSW 2015-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made by The Duct Company Pty Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure B. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[4] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.211 and 212 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[6] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 6 December 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE416347 PR702881>
- AGLC
- The Duct Company Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 7404
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 7404
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission revolved around whether the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were reasonable in the circumstances. This involved assessing the union’s claims against the company’s arguments, including the financial viability and practicality of implementing the proposed changes. The Commission had to balance the need for fair wages and conditions against the company's right to manage its business without undue regulatory burdens.
In its decision, the Commission carefully considered the economic and operational impact of the proposed changes on the company. It concluded that while the union's claims for improved wages and conditions were legitimate, the specific proposals put forth were not reasonable given the current economic context. The Commission found that the company had demonstrated a genuine inability to meet the union’s demands without significant financial strain, which would ultimately affect the sustainability of their operations. The decision ultimately rejected the union’s application for a variation of the enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.