The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Industrial Union of Employees, Queensland
Case
•
[2014] FWCD 694
•30 JUNE 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Industrial Union of Employees, Queensland [2014] FWCD 694
[2014] FWCD 694
30 JUNE 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In this matter, the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Industrial Union of Employees, Queensland (CFMEIUQ) applied for an entry permit for Mr Andrew Temoho, an Organiser within the CFMEIUQ and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The Fair Work Building & Construction (FWBC) opposed the application, and the CFMEU submitted in support of the application. The key issues in the case were whether Mr Temoho was a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit, and if so, whether any conditions should be imposed on the permit. The court considered various factors, including Mr Temoho's past conduct, his training, and the duty of disclosure in making the application.
The court concluded that Mr Temoho was a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit, despite his past involvement in unlawful industrial action and contraventions of industrial legislation. The court found that the relevant contraventions had occurred several years ago, and there was no evidence of subsequent findings or penalties. Additionally, the court acknowledged Mr Temoho's role as an Organiser and the importance of having a current permit for him to perform his duties effectively.
However, the court imposed a condition on the permit, requiring Mr Temoho to notify the Fair Work Commission within two weeks of any findings, penalties, or proceedings that may lead to findings or penalties relevant to the permit qualification matters. This condition was intended to address ongoing concerns about the potential repetition of similar conduct in the future.
The court concluded that Mr Temoho was a fit and proper person to hold an entry permit, despite his past involvement in unlawful industrial action and contraventions of industrial legislation. The court found that the relevant contraventions had occurred several years ago, and there was no evidence of subsequent findings or penalties. Additionally, the court acknowledged Mr Temoho's role as an Organiser and the importance of having a current permit for him to perform his duties effectively.
However, the court imposed a condition on the permit, requiring Mr Temoho to notify the Fair Work Commission within two weeks of any findings, penalties, or proceedings that may lead to findings or penalties relevant to the permit qualification matters. This condition was intended to address ongoing concerns about the potential repetition of similar conduct in the future.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Fiduciary Duty
-
Breach of Trust
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
The Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy, Industrial Union of Employees, Queensland (Andrew TeMoho) [2015] FWC 2526
Cases Citing This Decision
4
6497, Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Industrial Union of Employees, Queensland
[2014] FWCFB 7154
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
0
Craig v South Australia
[1995] HCA 58
The Maritime Union of Australia
[2014] FWCFB 1973