| [2023] FWC 2512 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
The Community and Public Sector Union
v
Commonwealth of Australia (Represented by the Fair Work Ombudsman)
(B2023/1031)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 29 SEPTEMBER 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Commonwealth of Australia (Represented by the Fair Work Ombudsman)
This is an application by the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Commonwealth of Australia (Represented by the Fair Work Ombudsman) (FWO or Employer).
On 29 September 2023, the Commission was advised that FWO did not object to the application as amended.[1]
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Rebecca Fawcett, Legal Director of the CPSU, relying on the Witness Statement of Ms D’arcy Horam setting out the steps taken by the CPSU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with FWO, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Vero Engagement & Voting Systems Solutions Pty Ltd T/A Vero Voting (Vero Voting). Vero Voting has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act[2] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 23 October 2023.[3] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR766683.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference and this Member will issue the Order requiring attendance at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Amendments were made to align the ‘group of employees to be balloted’ across the application and draft order.
[2] Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions T/A Vero Voting [2023] FWC 1531.
[3] This is, in effect, fifteen (15) working days from the date of effect of the Order as sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR766682>
- AGLC
- The Community and Public Sector Union v Commonwealth of Australia (Represented by the Fair Work Ombudsman) [2023] FWC 2512
- Case
- [2023] FWC 2512
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the notification time for the proposed agreement was valid and if the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act were fulfilled. The Commission also had to determine the closing date for the ballot to establish the ballot period. The decision was based on the declaration of Ms Rebecca Fawcett, Legal Director of the CPSU, and the witness statement of Ms D’arcy Horam, detailing the union's bargaining efforts and its genuine attempt to reach an agreement with the FWO.
The Commission determined that the notification time was valid and all requirements of section 443(1) of the Act were met. Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd T/A Vero Voting was approved to conduct the ballot. The Commission set the closing date for voting as 23 October 2023, establishing the ballot period for the purposes of section 448A(2) of the Act. A separate order was issued in PR766683, and the matter was assigned to another member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference.
This decision underscores the importance of meeting the legislative requirements for a protected action ballot and highlights the Commission's role in ensuring that the process is conducted in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission's decision will facilitate the ballot process, allowing the employees to participate in the decision-making process regarding their proposed agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.