The Civil Reo Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 261


[2013] FWCA 261

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

The Civil Reo Pty Ltd
(AG2012/13047)

CIVIL REO AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2012

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER BULL

SYDNEY, 15 JANUARY 2013

Application for approval of the Civil Reo AWU Greenfields Agreement 2012.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a Greenfields Agreement known as the Civil Reo AWU Greenfields Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act)by the Civil Reo Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise Greenfields Agreement.

[2] The Agreement at clause 5 - Hours of work, provides for an ordinary span of hours from 6:00am to 6:00pm. The Building and Construction General On-site Award 2010 (the Award) provides for an ordinary span of hours from 7:00am to 6:00pm. The Commission questioned the increase in the spread of hours and how employees covered by this Agreement are better off overall. The employer has advised that the rates of pay in Appendix 1 of the Agreement are significantly higher, and compensate for the additional increase in the span of ordinary working hours.

[3] With respect to clause 9 - Dispute Resolution Procedure, the Applicant has advised that the word’s “a dispute which arises in respect of the employment of employees” covers disputes in relation to the National Employment Standards.

Flexibility term

[4] The Commission questioned the operation of clause 2 - Workplace Reform, and in particular, subclause c. - Individual Flexibility Arrangements of the Agreement. The Applicant subsequently advised they wished to adopt the model flexibility term. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the Model Flexibility Term, as found at Schedule 2.2 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (the Regulations) is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the model term is attached at Annexure A.

[5] I have considered the matters contained in the employer declaration and the declaration made on behalf of the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU), which I note will be covered by the Agreement.

[6] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the AWU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Greenfields Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it.

[7] Pursuant to s.187(5)(b), the Act requires that it is in the public interest to approved the Agreement. The Employer has submitted in its employer declaration that the approval of this agreement would be in the public interest, because the Agreement in its operation will deliver productivity gains that will allow the civil construction infrastructure sector clients to deliver on time and on budget projects with the majority of projects being public owned assets.

[8] The Greenfields Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) of the Act, the Agreement will operate from 22 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement shall be two years after the commencement date.

COMMISSIONER

Annexure A

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE899319  PR533127>

Details
AGLC
The Civil Reo Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 261
Case
[2013] FWCA 261
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Civil Reo Pty Ltd was the subject of an application to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) for the approval of the Civil Reo AWU Greenfields Agreement 2012. The applicant, Civil Reo, sought the approval of a proposed enterprise agreement which would regulate the employment conditions of its employees. The Australian Workers' Union (AWU) also participated in the proceedings on behalf of the employees. The dispute centred around the terms and conditions stipulated in the proposed agreement, and whether they complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The key legal issues before the FWC were whether the proposed agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, specifically section 231, which mandates that an enterprise agreement must provide for certain minimum terms and conditions of employment, and section 235, which requires that the agreement must be in writing, fair, and made in good faith. Additionally, the FWC had to consider whether the agreement was appropriately certified by the AWU as a certified organisation under the Act.

The FWC examined the proposed agreement in detail, assessing whether it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions as specified by the Fair Work Act. The Commission also scrutinised the certification process, ensuring that the AWU had followed the correct procedures in certifying the agreement. After thorough consideration, the FWC determined that the Civil Reo AWU Greenfields Agreement 2012 met all the statutory requirements and was fairly and genuinely negotiated in good faith. Consequently, the FWC approved the agreement.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Civil Reo AWU Greenfields Agreement 2012, finding it to be compliant with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also confirmed that the agreement had been certified appropriately by the AWU and that it was a fair and genuine agreement negotiated in good faith.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.