| [2023] FWC 3261 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
The Australian Workers’ Union
v
Visy Board Pty Ltd and Visy Paper Pty Ltd in its capacity as the Trustee for the Southern Paper Converters Trust
(B2023/1335)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 6 DECEMBER 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Visy Board Pty Ltd; Visy Paper Pty Ltd in its capacity as the Trustee for the Southern Paper Converters Trust
This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Visy Board Pty Ltd and Visy Paper Pty Ltd in its capacity as the Trustee for the Southern Paper Converters Trust (Visy Paper or Employer).
I note that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) have made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement.[1]
On 6 December 2023, the Commission was advised, in effect, that Visy did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Paul Konaris on behalf of the AWU, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Visy, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 22 January 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An order has been separately issued in PR769081.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter (B2023/1336). To the extent that this matter involves any additional bargaining representatives, the Commission will also issue the Order requiring their attendance at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2023/1336.
[2] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order, which is the period required by the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct a ballot.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR769080>
- AGLC
- The Australian Workers' Union v Visy Board Pty Ltd and Visy Paper Pty Ltd in its capacity as the Trustee for the Southern Paper Converters Trust [2023] FWC 3261
- Case
- [2023] FWC 3261
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide whether the application met the requirements of section 443 of the Act, including whether there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and whether the AWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Visy. The court also had to determine the date by which voting should close for the purpose of section 443(3)(c) of the Act, which establishes the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act.
The Deputy President Hampton was satisfied that the AWU had met all the requirements in section 443(1) of the Act, and there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement. The court determined that the date by which voting is to close is 22 January 2024, which is 30 working days from the making of the Order, the period required by the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct a ballot. The court issued an order separately in PR769081. The matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter (B2023/1336). The court also noted that the parties would be required to attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations, and Directions would likely be issued to ensure their attendance.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.