| [2025] FWC 1593 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
The Australian Workers' Union
v
Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd
(B2025/905)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 10 JUNE 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Australian Workers' Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd (Cleanaway or Employer).
On 10 June 2025, the Commission was advised that the parties had reached a consent position in relation to the inclusion of an extended notice period for taking protected industrial action.
In the circumstances, I have decided to amend the application to reflect the consent position reached and otherwise determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ross Kumeroa, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Cleanaway, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 24 June 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended minimum period of written notice of five (5) working days for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission.
An Order has been separately issued in PR788052.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR788053>
- AGLC
- The Australian Workers' Union v Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 1593
- Case
- [2025] FWC 1593
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the AWU had fulfilled the necessary requirements under the Fair Work Act to conduct the ballot, and whether there were exceptional circumstances that justified extending the minimum notice period for industrial action. The Commission also needed to determine if the ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd, was suitably authorised to conduct the ballot.
The Commission determined that the AWU had satisfied all requirements for conducting the ballot, as evidenced by the declaration from the AWU Organiser, Ross Kumeroa. The Commission found that the AWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Cleanaway during bargaining. Additionally, the Commission accepted that there were exceptional circumstances that warranted extending the notice period for industrial action to five working days. The date for closing the voting was set as 24 June 2025, effectively 10 working days from the making of the order. The Commission also assigned the matter to another Member to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference, requiring all bargaining representatives to attend.
The Commission issued an order to conduct the ballot and scheduled a compulsory conciliation conference. This decision ensures that the ballot can proceed under the specified conditions and that further negotiations will be facilitated to reach a potential agreement between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.