Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Terrigal Grosvenor Lodge Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 1039 PARTIES: APPLICANT
Terrigal Grosvenor Lodge Pty LtdRESPONDENT
Wingecarribee Shire CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 10874 of 2009 CORAM: Brown C KEY ISSUES: CONSENT ORDERS :- modification of Court approved seniors living development LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 96(8) DATES OF HEARING: Documentation provided 24 December 2009, 4 February 2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
26 February 2010LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
Mr D Balog, solicitor
SOLICITORS
D.C.Balog & Associates
Mr B Bilinsky, solicitor
SOLICITORS
B. Bilinsky & Co
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESBrown C
26 February 2010
JUDGMENT10874 of 2009 Terrigal Grosvenor Lodge Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council
1 COMMISSIONER: This matter comes before the Court pursuant to s 96(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 for the modification of a development consent granted by the Court (Terrigal Grosvenor Lodge v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2008] NSWLEC 1162) for the demolition of some existing structures and the erection of a seniors living development at the corner of Moss Vale Road and Links Road, Bowral.
2 The parties agreed that due to the relatively minor changes the modification application could be considered in Chambers.
3 The modification application seeks minor changes generated by the need to comply with the requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 and Australian Standard AS 1428.1 - 1968. The modification application also seeks to change the method of payment of the s 94 development contributions. A comprehensive list of the proposed changes is detailed in the documentation provided with the modification application.
4 The council provided the following relevant response to the modification application:
Proposed modification involves minor tweaks to approved building footprints, increased retention of trees (11 more trees retained, 3 more trees removed - net gain of 8 trees), and staging of s.94 contributions to be paid in four stages. This modification does not require notification under Council's DCP, therefore no notification undertaken & no submissions received .Applicant is seeking a modification to the court approved Seniors Living development on the corner of Links Rd & Moss Vale Rd, Burradoo. L&E Court is the consent authority for the proposed 96(8) modification .
No objection to the minor alterations to the approved plans as shown in plans currently before the Court. No objection to the staging of the s.94 contributions.Proposed minor modification involving minor tweaks to approved building footprints, increased retention of trees (11 more trees retained, 3 more trees removed - net gain of 8 trees) is considered an improvement upon the originally development approved by the L&E Court. Council's s.94 planner raises no objection to the staging of the s.94 contributions.
5 On the basis of the minor nature of the modifications, the agreement of the council to the changes and that the modifications to do not require advertising under the council's development control plan, then there are no reasons why the Consent that the Orders should not be made.
6 The Order of the Court, by consent, is:
- 1. Development Application LUA 06/1428 for the demolition of some existing structures and the erection of a seniors living development at the corner of Moss Vale Road and Links Road, Bowral and approved by the Land and Environment Court on 11 June 2008, modified on 22 January 2009 is further modified and is subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
G T Brown
Commissioner of the Court
- AGLC
- Terrigal Grosvenor Lodge Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 1039
- Case
- [2010] NSWLEC 1039
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issue before the Court was whether the modifications, which were relatively minor and agreed upon by the council, warranted approval under section 96(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The Court had to determine if the modifications aligned with the original intent of the development consent and whether they complied with relevant planning and building standards. The applicant argued that the modifications were necessary to comply with the State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 and Australian Standard AS 1428.1 - 1968.
The Court found that the modifications were minor and did not fundamentally alter the nature of the approved development. Given the agreement of the council and the minor nature of the changes, the Court concluded that there were no valid reasons to refuse the modification application. The Court noted that the proposed modifications, including the retention of additional trees and adjustments to the building plans, were improvements over the original consent. Consequently, the Court granted the modification by consent, subject to the conditions outlined in Annexure A.
The final orders of the Court were that the development application, which had previously been modified and approved, was further modified to incorporate the agreed changes. This decision allowed the applicant to proceed with the modified development plan, ensuring compliance with the necessary planning and building standards.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.