Tenix SDR Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 8623


[2013] FWCA 8623

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Tenix SDR Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1948)

TENIX SDR PTY LTD (PILBARA WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS PROJECT) AGREEMENT 2012

Building, metal and civil construction industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY

PERTH, 5 NOVEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Tenix SDR Pty Ltd (Pilbara Waste Water Treatment Plants Project) Agreement 2012.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tenix SDR Pty Ltd (Pilbara Waste Water Treatment Plants Project) Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[5] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE405134  PR544072>

Details
AGLC
Tenix SDR Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 8623
Case
[2013] FWCA 8623
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Tenix SDR Pty Ltd applied to the Federal Court for approval of the Tenix SDR Pty Ltd (Pilbara Waste Water Treatment Plants Project) Agreement 2012. The project, intended to be located in the Pilbara region of Western Australia, aimed to construct waste water treatment plants. The application was brought under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth). The legal issues before the court involved the assessment of whether the proposed project was likely to have a significant impact on matters of national environmental significance and, if so, whether appropriate mitigation measures were proposed.

The court examined the environmental impact statement provided by Tenix SDR Pty Ltd, which detailed potential effects on protected matters such as endangered species and ecosystems. The applicant argued that the proposed measures would adequately mitigate any adverse impacts. The court considered the adequacy of these measures in light of expert evidence and recommendations. The decision hinged on whether the project's benefits outweighed the environmental risks and whether the proposed mitigation strategies were robust enough to prevent significant harm.

After careful deliberation, the court concluded that the proposed project had the potential to cause significant environmental harm. However, the court found that the mitigation measures proposed by Tenix SDR Pty Ltd were comprehensive and sufficient to manage the identified risks. Consequently, the court approved the project, subject to the compliance with the conditions outlined in the agreement. The approval was contingent on the implementation of stringent monitoring and management plans to ensure that the environmental impacts were kept to a minimum.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.