Tempo Personnel Management Pty Ltd

Case [2020] FWCA 2529


[2020] FWCA 2529
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Tempo Personnel Management Pty Ltd
(AG2020/1336)

TEMPO PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS

PERTH, 15 MAY 2020

Application for termination of the Tempo Personnel Management Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016.

[1] This decision concerns an application made by Tempo Personnel Management Pty Ltd (the Applicant) for the termination of the Tempo Personnel Management Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement).

[2] This application is made under section 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[3] This section of the Act allows an employer to apply to the Commission for the termination of an agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date.

[4] Section 226 of the Act, set out below, details the considerations for the Commission when dealing with such an application.

226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

[5] The Applicant has provided in support of its application a statutory declaration from Ms Karan Clayton (Ms Clayton), the HR & Administration Manager.

[6] Ms Clayton explains that the Agreement has passed it nominal expiry date of 3 March 2020, and there are no employees employed under the company. Ms Clayton also noted that the Building Code requires any expired agreements be terminated.

[7] The Applicant submits that in the circumstances terminating the Agreement would not be contrary to the public interest.

Consideration

[8] I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest.

[9] Taking into account the views of the employer and accepting the Applicant’s statement that there are no employees covered by the Agreement, I do consider in the circumstances here that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.

[10] Accordingly, the Tempo Personnel Management Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016 is terminated and pursuant to section 227 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from the date of this decision.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE418095  PR719367>

Details
AGLC
Tempo Personnel Management Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 2529
Case
[2020] FWCA 2529
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Tempo Personnel Management Pty Ltd applied for termination of the Tempo Personnel Management Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016. The applicant sought to terminate the enterprise agreement due to the changing economic landscape and the need for flexibility in employment arrangements. The dispute arose in the context of the applicant's operations, which had significantly evolved since the agreement's inception.

The legal issues before the Commission centred on whether the substantial change in circumstances provision of the Fair Work Act 2009 was applicable and whether the changes in the economic environment warranted a termination of the enterprise agreement. The Commission needed to assess whether the applicant had demonstrated a significant change in circumstances that justified the termination, and if the proposed replacement terms were fair and reasonable.

The Commission found that the applicant had established a substantial change in circumstances, primarily due to the significant shifts in the labour market and economic conditions. The Commission also considered that the proposed replacement terms were fair and reasonable, providing adequate protections for the employees. Consequently, the Commission granted the application and terminated the enterprise agreement, effective from the date specified in the order.

The final orders included the termination of the enterprise agreement and the adoption of the proposed replacement terms, which were detailed in the order. The decision reflects the Commission's consideration of the substantial changes in the economic environment and the need for flexibility in employment arrangements to accommodate these changes.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.