Templeton v Office of Environment & Heritage
Case
•
[2016] NSWCATAD 312
•11 October 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Templeton v Office of Environment & Heritage [2016] NSWCATAD 312
[2016] NSWCATAD 312
11 October 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter of Templeton v Office of Environment & Heritage came before the court in relation to a dispute regarding the access to government information under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (GIPA). The Applicant, Mr. Templeton, sought access to certain information held by the Office of Environment & Heritage (OEH). The dispute centred on the sufficiency of the OEH's search for the information requested and whether the information was held by the agency.
The primary legal issue for the court to determine was whether the OEH conducted a reasonable search for the information requested by Mr. Templeton and whether the information sought was held by the agency. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the OEH was obligated to search other agencies for the information if it was not held within their own records.
The court found that the OEH had conducted a reasonable search for the information requested and had not identified any records that contained the information sought. The court also determined that the information was not held by the OEH. Furthermore, the court held that there was no obligation on the OEH to search other agencies for the information if it was not within their own records. The court concluded that the OEH's decision not to hold the information was reasonable and lawful under the GIPA.
The primary legal issue for the court to determine was whether the OEH conducted a reasonable search for the information requested by Mr. Templeton and whether the information sought was held by the agency. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the OEH was obligated to search other agencies for the information if it was not held within their own records.
The court found that the OEH had conducted a reasonable search for the information requested and had not identified any records that contained the information sought. The court also determined that the information was not held by the OEH. Furthermore, the court held that there was no obligation on the OEH to search other agencies for the information if it was not within their own records. The court concluded that the OEH's decision not to hold the information was reasonable and lawful under the GIPA.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Information Not Held
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
GKD v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2025] NSWCATAD 19
Cases Citing This Decision
22
GKD v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force
[2025] NSWCATAD 19
GPP v Secretary, Department of Education
[2024] NSWCATAD 275
CLT v Department of Education
[2021] NSWCATAD 249
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
1
Camilleri v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force
[2012] NSWADT 5
Hemeon v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service
[2002] NSWADT 201
Cianfrano v Director General Department of Commerce and anor (No 2)
[2006] NSWADT 195