Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Limited Summary

[2013] FWCA 5262

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Limited
(AG2013/7610)

TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY OMBUDSMAN LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Commonwealth employment
COMMISSIONER WILSON	MELBOURNE, 1 AUGUST 2013

Application for approval of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Limited. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 8 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The dispute between the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Limited and its employees was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The central issue was the approval of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013. The TIO sought to have the agreement, which had been negotiated with the Communications, Electrical and Plumbing Union, ratified. The union, on behalf of the employees, argued that certain provisions of the agreement were unfair and did not comply with the relevant legislative requirements.

The Commission needed to determine whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved assessing if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it complied with the procedural fairness requirements. The union raised concerns about the process used to negotiate the agreement, particularly whether the TIO had adequately consulted with the employees and whether the agreement provided adequate protections for employees.

In its decision, the Commission found that the TIO had generally met its obligations to consult with the union and the employees. The Commission noted that while there were some procedural issues, these did not significantly undermine the fairness of the agreement. The Commission also found that the provisions of the agreement were not unfair and that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission concluded that the agreement should be approved and made orders accordingly.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013, subject to certain conditions aimed at ensuring compliance with the Fair Work Act. These conditions included specific timelines for the TIO to provide further information to the Commission and to engage in further consultation with the employees. The union's concerns about the negotiation process were noted, but the Commission determined that they did not warrant refusal of the agreement.

Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Limited

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established