Telama and Telama
Case
•
[2011] FamCA 81
•21 February 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Telama and Telama [2011] FamCA 81
[2011] FamCA 81
21 February 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Telama and Telama*, the husband was ordered to pay the wife's costs. The dispute concerned the husband's application filed on 13 October 2009 and the wife's subsequent oral costs application made on 4 March 2010. The court was required to determine the appropriate orders regarding the costs associated with these applications.
The court's reasoning and the legal principles applied are not detailed in the provided text, beyond the final orders. However, the outcome indicates that the court found in favour of the wife concerning the costs of both the husband's initial application and the wife's costs application.
The final orders stipulated that the husband was to pay to the wife her costs of and incidental to the husband’s Application in a Case filed 13 October 2009, as well as the wife’s costs of and incidental to the costs application made orally on 4 March 2010. These costs were to be assessed or agreed upon within one month of such assessment or agreement.
The court's reasoning and the legal principles applied are not detailed in the provided text, beyond the final orders. However, the outcome indicates that the court found in favour of the wife concerning the costs of both the husband's initial application and the wife's costs application.
The final orders stipulated that the husband was to pay to the wife her costs of and incidental to the husband’s Application in a Case filed 13 October 2009, as well as the wife’s costs of and incidental to the costs application made orally on 4 March 2010. These costs were to be assessed or agreed upon within one month of such assessment or agreement.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Telama and Telama [2011] FamCA 81
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0