[2016] FWCA 625
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement |
| Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd |
| (AG2016/29) |
TEEKAY SHIPPING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD NINGALOO VISION
AIMPE FAIR WORK AGREEMENT 2015
Oil and gas industry
| COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 1 FEBRUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd Ningaloo Vision AIMPE
Fair Work Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd Ningaloo Vision AIMPE Fair Work Agreement 2015 (the
Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
It has been made by Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd (the Employer). The Agreement is a
single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 8 January 2016. The application included a
Statutory Declaration of Grant Hardie made on behalf of the Employer and dated 8 January
2016 (the Declaration). The Declaration stated that the Agreement was made on 29 December
2015. Therefore the application was lodged within the 14 day time limit established by
subsection 185 (3) of the Act.
[3] Part 2-4 of the Act includes various procedural requirements that must be satisfied
before the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) can approve of an enterprise agreement.
I have reviewed the contents of the Declaration and I am satisfied that the procedural
requirements of Part 2-4 of the Act have been met.
[4] The application for approval was listed for Hearing in Chambers before the
Commission on 1 February 2016. I note that the file has included a Statutory Declaration of
Martin Byrne made on behalf of The Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers (the
AIMPE), as an employee organisation in relation to the application.
[5] I note that the Agreement contains a flexibility term at clause 9 and a consultation
term at clause 32.
[6] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are
relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[2016] FWCA 625
[7] The AIMPE, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice
under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by subsection 201
(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the AIMPE.
[8] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with subsection 54 (1) of the Act it will
operate from 8 February 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement as specified in
clause 5 of the Agreement, is 30 June 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE417628 PR576576>
- AGLC
- Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 625
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 625
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the procedural requirements under Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act had been met, and if the agreement satisfied the conditions for approval as per sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Act. Additionally, the Commission needed to ascertain whether the agreement was intended to cover The Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers (AIMPE), as notified under section 183 of the Act.
The Commission found that all procedural requirements of the Act were satisfied, including the timely lodging of the application and the statutory declarations provided. Furthermore, the AIMPE had notified its intent for the agreement to cover its members, and the Commission confirmed that the agreement indeed covered the AIMPE as required by the Act. Having reviewed the agreement, the Commission concluded that all relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act were met, leading to the approval of the agreement. The agreement was set to operate from 8 February 2016, with a nominal expiry date of 30 June 2019.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.