| [2021] FWCA 4958 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2021/6426)
TEEKAY SHIPPING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD AIMPE ENGINEER OFFICERS MATV SYCAMORE AGREEMENT 2021
Maritime industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 11 AUGUST 2021 |
Application for approval of the Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd AIMPE Engineer Officers MATV Sycamore Agreement 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd AIMPE Engineer Officers MATV Sycamore Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] I observe that the following provision is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
• Clause 8.2(b) - Notice of termination by an Employee.
However, noting the undertakings provided, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 18 August 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2025.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE512703 PR732747>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 4958
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 4958
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the provisions of the proposed agreement were consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act 2009. This included ensuring that the agreement did not disadvantage the employees and complied with the requirements for multi-employer agreements. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the changes proposed in the agreement were reasonable and necessary to accommodate the specific operational needs of the applicant’s business.
In reaching its decision, the Commission examined the nature of the changes proposed in the agreement, as well as the historical context and practices within the maritime industry. The Commission noted that the changes were intended to address operational efficiencies and safety requirements, which were critical in the offshore drilling environment. The Commission determined that the proposed changes did not unacceptably disadvantage the employees and were necessary to meet the operational needs of the industry. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the order.
The final orders confirmed the approval of the agreement, with certain conditions to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. These conditions included provisions for ongoing review and the ability for the Commission to revisit the agreement if any issues of non-compliance arose. The decision provided clarity on the interpretation and application of the Fair Work Act in the context of multi-employer agreements within the maritime sector.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.