| [2021] FWCA 5274 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd
(AG2021/6670)
TEEKAY MARINE RESOURCES PTY LTD CFMMEU OCEAN PROTECTOR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021
Maritime industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 25 AUGUST 2021 |
Application for approval of the Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd CFMMEU Ocean Protector Enterprise Agreement 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd CFMMEU Ocean Protector Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] I observe that the following provision is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
• Clause 10.2(b) - Notice of termination by an Employee.
However, noting the undertakings provided, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 September 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2025.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE512873 PR733192>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 5274
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 5274
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the agreement was a "better off overall test" (BOOT) compliant enterprise agreement. The opposition argued that the agreement failed to meet the BOOT, as it did not provide adequate protections for employees in relation to their working conditions, including those relating to shift patterns and rostering. The opposition also argued that the agreement did not provide adequate protections for employees in relation to their redundancy entitlements.
In determining whether the agreement was BOOT compliant, Deputy President Azzopardi considered the terms of the agreement, as well as the submissions made by both parties. The Deputy President found that the agreement did not provide adequate protections for employees in relation to their working conditions, including those relating to shift patterns and rostering. However, the Deputy President found that the agreement did provide adequate protections for employees in relation to their redundancy entitlements. As such, the Deputy President concluded that the agreement was BOOT compliant and approved the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd CFMMEU Ocean Protector Enterprise Agreement 2021. The Deputy President found that while the agreement did not provide adequate protections for employees in relation to their working conditions, it did provide adequate protections for employees in relation to their redundancy entitlements. As such, the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and was approved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.