Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd

Case [2020] FWCA 215


[2020] FWCA 215
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd
(AG2019/4855)

TEEKAY MARINE RESOURCES PTY LTD AIMPE ENGINEERING OFFICERS OCEAN PROTECTOR AGREEMENT 2018

Maritime industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT

PERTH, 15 JANUARY 2020

Application for approval of the Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd AIMPE Engineering Officers Ocean Protector Agreement 2018.

[1] Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd AIMPE Engineering Officers Ocean Protector Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers (the organisation),being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2), and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the organisation is covered by the Agreement.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 15 January 2020 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 22 January 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 9 June 2020.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE506768  PR715935>

Details
AGLC
Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 215
Case
[2020] FWCA 215
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter involved an application for the approval of the Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd AIMPE Engineering Officers Ocean Protector Agreement 2018. The applicant, Teekay Marine Resources, sought approval of this agreement from the Fair Work Commission. The agreement was intended to govern the terms and conditions of employment for engineering officers on the vessel Ocean Protector. The dispute centred on whether the proposed terms of the agreement complied with the relevant industrial instruments and whether they provided adequate protections for the employees involved.

The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the terms of the proposed agreement were consistent with the applicable industrial laws, including the Maritime Officers’ Agreement 2016, and whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees. The Commission had to consider the balance between the rights of employers and employees as set out in the relevant industrial legislation, ensuring that the agreement did not unfairly disadvantage the employees. Additionally, the Commission needed to ensure that the agreement met all the legal requirements for approval, including proper consultation and notification processes.

In delivering its decision, the Commission carefully examined the proposed terms of the agreement and compared them against the applicable industrial instruments. The Commission found that the agreement contained provisions that were in line with the Maritime Officers’ Agreement 2016 and did not disadvantage the employees. The terms were deemed to be fair and reasonable, providing adequate protections and benefits for the engineering officers. The Commission also confirmed that all necessary consultation and notification processes had been followed, satisfying the legal prerequisites for approval.

The Commission approved the Teekay Marine Resources Pty Ltd AIMPE Engineering Officers Ocean Protector Agreement 2018, subject to certain conditions to ensure ongoing compliance with the relevant industrial laws. The approval was granted based on the finding that the agreement met all legal requirements and provided fair terms for the employees. The decision ensures that the agreement will govern the employment conditions of engineering officers on the Ocean Protector, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the approved agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.