[2014] FWCA 1492 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Team Rail Construction Pty Ltd
(AG2013/12238)
TEAM RAIL CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 3 MARCH 2014 |
Application for approval of the Team Rail Construction Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Team Rail Construction Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Team Rail Construction Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] I am satisfied that The Australian Workers’ Union, the employee organisation to be covered by the agreement, is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 3 March 2014 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 10 March 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 3 September 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE407108 PR548292>
- AGLC
- Team Rail Construction Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 1492
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 1492
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement met the necessary standards under the Fair Work Act, including the provision of minimum entitlements and protections for employees. The Commission needed to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms, and whether it was in the best interests of the employees involved. Specifically, the Commission examined the provisions related to pay rates, overtime, leave entitlements, and the overall fairness of the agreement.
The Commission found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and provided for fair and reasonable terms. The agreement included provisions that were no less favourable than the applicable awards, and provided for a range of benefits and protections for employees. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, and approved the application for registration. The agreement is now legally binding on both Team Rail Construction and the employees covered by the agreement.
The Commission's decision confirms the importance of ensuring that agreements between employers and employees meet the necessary standards under the Fair Work Act. The decision also highlights the need for employers to provide fair and reasonable terms to their employees, and to consider the best interests of their employees when negotiating agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.