TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal
Case
•
[1992] FCA 440
•24 JUNE 1992
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal [1992] FCA 440
[1992] FCA 440
24 JUNE 1992
CaseChat Overview and Summary
TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd initiated legal proceedings against the Australian Broadcasting Tribunal, challenging a Program Standard imposed by a Division of the Tribunal that limited the amount of non-program matter a television station licensee could broadcast. The case was heard and determined by the Federal Court of Australia. The crux of the dispute was whether the Division of the Tribunal had the jurisdiction to enact the Program Standard, if it was empowered under the terms of its original appointment or otherwise to make such a decision, if it was authorised under section 15C of the Broadcasting Act 1942 to determine standards in line with paragraph 16(1)(d), and if the Tribunal could establish binding standards without resorting to orders under section 17 of the Broadcasting Act.
The court examined the statutory framework and the Tribunal's powers, determining that the Division did not have the jurisdiction to enact the Program Standard as it went beyond the scope of its original appointment. The court found that the Division was not empowered to make such a decision either under the terms of its original appointment or by any other means. Furthermore, the court concluded that the Division was not authorised under section 15C of the Broadcasting Act 1942 to determine the standards as per paragraph 16(1)(d). Finally, the court held that the Tribunal could not establish binding standards without making orders under section 17 of the Broadcasting Act.
The Federal Court ordered the proceedings to be stood over to a date to be fixed for the making of orders, to give effect to the reasons for judgment delivered on 24 June 1992. The settlement and entry of orders were to be dealt with in accordance with Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The court examined the statutory framework and the Tribunal's powers, determining that the Division did not have the jurisdiction to enact the Program Standard as it went beyond the scope of its original appointment. The court found that the Division was not empowered to make such a decision either under the terms of its original appointment or by any other means. Furthermore, the court concluded that the Division was not authorised under section 15C of the Broadcasting Act 1942 to determine the standards as per paragraph 16(1)(d). Finally, the court held that the Tribunal could not establish binding standards without making orders under section 17 of the Broadcasting Act.
The Federal Court ordered the proceedings to be stood over to a date to be fixed for the making of orders, to give effect to the reasons for judgment delivered on 24 June 1992. The settlement and entry of orders were to be dealt with in accordance with Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Statutory Interpretation
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
ROBERTS v JUNIPER & ANOR
[2013] FCCA 130
Cases Citing This Decision
22
Pyramid Building Society (In liq) v Terry
[1997] HCA 48
Pyramid Building Society (In liq) v Terry
[1997] HCA 48
Roberts v Juniper
[2013] FCCA 130
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
0
Herald-Sun TV Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal
[1985] HCA 32
Herald-Sun TV Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal
[1985] HCA 32
Re Thorpe, R. (also known as Peter) v Ex parte Thorpe, R.
[1988] FCA 283