[2013] FWCA 3398 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
TB-Kawashima Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2013/5911)
TB KAWASHIMA AUSTRALIA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Textile industry | |
JUSTICE BOULTON, SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT | SYDNEY, 29 MAY 2013 |
Application for approval of the TB Kawashima Australia Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the TB Kawashima Australia Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was not lodged within 14 days after it was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b) of the Act, I consider it fair to extend the time for making this application until the actual date of lodgement.
[3] Undertakings have been provided by TB-Kawashima Australia Pty Ltd in relation to the rate of pay for employees at Skill Level 2, the procedure for the resolution of disputes, and the payment of allowances. The undertakings have been attached to the Agreement and will be taken to be terms of the Agreement pursuant to s.191 of the Act.
[4] It is noted that the Agreement does not contain a consultation term that complies with s.205 of the Act. In accordance with s.205(2), the Agreement shall be taken to include the model consultation term set out in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009.
[5] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 that are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 5 June 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 29 May 2016.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE401489 PR537345>
- AGLC
- TB-Kawashima Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 3398
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3398
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court had to consider if the agreement met the criteria for "better off overall" as well as whether it contained the mandatory terms prescribed by the Act. Additionally, the court needed to ensure that the agreement had been fairly negotiated and that the process for its approval was in accordance with the legislative framework.
The court found that the enterprise agreement did indeed meet all the necessary statutory requirements. The terms of the agreement were considered to be fair and balanced, ensuring that the employees were better off overall. The court was satisfied that the negotiation process was genuine and that the agreement contained all the mandatory terms as required by the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the court approved the TB Kawashima Australia Enterprise Agreement 2012.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.