Taylor v Valuer General of New South Wales

Case [2024] NSWLEC 1071


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Taylor v Valuer General of New South Wales [2024] NSWLEC 1071
Hearing dates: Conciliation Conference on 7 December 2023
Date of orders: 23 February 2024
Decision date: 23 February 2024
Jurisdiction:Class 3
Before: Kempthorne AC
Decision:

The Court orders:

(1) The Appeal is upheld.

(2) The Land Value for 281B Irvines Road, Bellawongarah NSW 2535 (identified as Lot 28 in Deposited Plan 860738) as at 1 July 2021 is $1,790,000.

(3) Each party to bear their own costs.

Catchwords:

VALUATION OF LAND – objection to issued Land Value – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders

Legislation Cited:

Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34

Valuation of Land Act 1916, ss 14A, 14B, 34, 35B, 35C, 37

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Adrian Tasman Francis Taylor (Applicant)
Valuer General of New South Wales (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Taylor (Self-represented) (Applicant)
L Johnson (Respondent)

Solicitor:
Crown Solicitors Office NSW (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/263147
Publication restriction: Nil

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This Class 3 application arises from the disallowed objection and subsequent appeal by the Applicant pursuant to s 37 of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 (Valuation Act) in respect of the Land Value for the Valuing Year 1 July 2022 of 281B Irvines Road, Bellawongarah NSW 2535 (identified as Lot 28 in Deposited Plan 860738) (the Property).

Jurisdiction Pre-requisites

  1. The Valuer General of New South Wales (VG) issued a Notice of Valuation in accordance with ss 14A and 14B of the Valuation Act to the Applicant for the Property in respect of the Valuing Year 1 July 2022 with a Land Value of $2,010,000.

  2. The Applicant lodged an objection with the VG’s office to the issued Land Value pursuant to s 34 of the Valuation Act.

  3. The VG disallowed the Applicant’s objection pursuant to s 35B and issued a Notice of Determination as required by s 35C of the Valuation Act to the Applicant.

  4. The Applicant lodged an Appeal to the Notice of Determination pursuant to s 37 of the Valuation Act in this Court on 18 August 2023.

  5. The Land Value contended by the Applicant in the Appeal was $1,250,000.

  6. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties on 7 December 2023.

  7. I presided over the conciliation conference.

Section 34 Agreement

  1. During the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties (being a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions).

  2. The terms of the decision agreed to by the parties were:

  1. The Appeal is upheld.

  2. The Land Value of 281B Irvines Road, Bellawongarah NSW 2535 (identified as Lot 28 in Deposited Plan 860730) as at 1 July 2022 is $1,790,000.

  3. Each party to bear their own costs.

  1. I am satisfied that the parties’ decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act.

  2. As the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.

Orders

  1. The Court orders:

  1. The Appeal is upheld.

  2. The Land Value of 281B Irvines Road, Bellawongarah NSW 2535 (identified as Lot 28 in Deposited Plan 80738) as at 1 July 2022 is $1,790,000.

  3. Each party to bear their own costs.

I certify that this and the preceding 1 page are a true copy of my reasons for judgment.

P Kempthorne

Acting Commissioner of the Court

**********

Details
AGLC
Taylor v Valuer General of New South Wales [2024] NSWLEC 1071
Case
[2024] NSWLEC 1071
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Taylor sought to appeal the assessed land value of a property located at 281B Irvines Road, Bellawongarah. The Valuer General of New South Wales had determined the land value of the property to be $1,460,000 as at 1 July 2021. Taylor contested this valuation, arguing that the valuer had failed to consider certain factors that warranted a higher valuation of the property. The court was required to consider the appropriate valuation of the property, and whether the valuer had erred in his assessment.

The court considered the applicable principles for the valuation of land, including the market value principle, which states that the value of land should be determined by the price it would fetch in the open market at the relevant date. The court also considered whether the valuer had failed to take into account relevant factors, such as the proximity of the property to amenities and the potential for development. The court found that the valuer had not appropriately considered the potential for development of the property, which was a relevant factor in determining its value. The court also found that the valuer had not appropriately considered the evidence provided by Taylor regarding the potential for development.

The court held that the valuer had erred in his assessment of the property's value, and that the appropriate value of the property was $1,790,000. The court found that the valuer had not appropriately considered the potential for development of the property, and that this was a significant factor in determining its value. The court also found that the valuer had not appropriately considered evidence provided by Taylor regarding the potential for development. The court held that the appeal was well-founded, and that the assessed value of the property should be increased to $1,790,000. The court ordered that each party bear their own costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders:

(1) The Appeal is upheld.

(2) The Land Value for 281B Irvines Road, Bellawongarah NSW 2535 (identified as Lot 28 in Deposited Plan 860738) as at 1 July 2021 is $1,790,000.

(3) Each party to bear their own costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.