Taylor v J & D Stephens Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2018] NSWCA 287
•28 November 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Un v Chow [2018] NSWCA 287
[2018] NSWCA 287
28 November 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellant, Taylor, brought proceedings against the respondents, J & D Stephens Pty Ltd and another, alleging defamation. The core of the dispute concerned imputations made by the appellant which were maintained to be true. The appeal was heard by Basten and Leeming JJA, and Barrett AJA.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the appellant could succeed on appeal, given that the defence of truth, which the appellant maintained was available, had not been raised at the trial. The court was required to consider the implications of this failure to plead and rely on the defence of truth at the initial hearing.
The court reasoned that the appellant's assertion that the imputations were true, without having formally pleaded or relied upon the defence of truth at trial, was insufficient to establish grounds for appeal. The failure to raise this defence at the appropriate stage meant that the trial court had not had the opportunity to consider it. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Leave to appeal against the second respondent was granted to the extent necessary, and the appeal was dismissed with costs.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the appellant could succeed on appeal, given that the defence of truth, which the appellant maintained was available, had not been raised at the trial. The court was required to consider the implications of this failure to plead and rely on the defence of truth at the initial hearing.
The court reasoned that the appellant's assertion that the imputations were true, without having formally pleaded or relied upon the defence of truth at trial, was insufficient to establish grounds for appeal. The failure to raise this defence at the appropriate stage meant that the trial court had not had the opportunity to consider it. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Leave to appeal against the second respondent was granted to the extent necessary, and the appeal was dismissed with costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Un v Chow [2018] NSWCA 287
Most Recent Citation
Moorby v J & D Stephens Pty Ltd & Ors [2024] NSWPIC 36
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Peter P v Clarence C (No. 2)
[2020] NSWDC 465
Burns v Gaynor
[2018] NSWDC 358
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
4
Chow v Un
[2017] NSWDC 254
Chow v Un (No. 2)
[2017] NSWDC 301
NSW Arabian Horse Association Inc v Olympic Co-ordination Authority
[2005] NSWCA 210