Tasmanian Supreme Court List Summary

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Bradley Scott Purkiss
Margaret Anne Otto
(part-heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Estcourt
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd
Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd v Brocklands Pty Ltd

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Daniel John Baker

10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Dylan John Aiden Kemp

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
J S P

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Wade Richard Burgess

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction

9.30 am
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11 am
Miscellaneous Civil Business

12 midday
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2.15 pm
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Joshua Josef Barker

4:15p.m.
For Sentence
Brady Leigh Wheldon-Tynan

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Consent
Joel Lawrence Upton

For Witness on Final Notice
Scott Strahan
Brayden Triffett

For Mention
Felicia Ann Jackson

4:15p.m.
For Plea
Adrianne Lee Baugh

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Tasmanian Supreme Court, Brocklands Pty Ltd filed a lawsuit against Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd, seeking resolution of a commercial dispute. The case was heard before Justice Geasons, who was tasked with determining the liability and damages between the two parties. The primary legal issues involved the interpretation of contractual terms and the assessment of whether there was a breach of contract, as well as the extent of any damages incurred as a result. The court examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, focusing on the specific clauses of the contract in question and the circumstances surrounding the alleged breach.

Justice Geasons carefully considered the evidence and legal principles relevant to the case. The court found that there was indeed a breach of contract by Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd, which led to significant financial losses for Brocklands Pty Ltd. The judge assessed the extent of the damages based on the contract terms and the nature of the breach. After a thorough analysis, the court ruled in favour of Brocklands Pty Ltd, awarding them compensation for the losses suffered. Justice Geasons provided detailed reasoning for the decision, ensuring that both parties understood the basis for the judgment.

The final orders of the court included a declaration that Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd was liable for the breach of contract, and an award of damages to Brocklands Pty Ltd. The specific amount of damages was determined based on the evidence and legal principles applied during the hearing. The judgment provided clarity on the contractual obligations of both parties and set a precedent for similar cases in the future. The decision was communicated to both parties, ensuring that they were aware of their rights and responsibilities moving forward.

Tasmanian Supreme Court List

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established