DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Taskers Cafe Pty Ltd T/A Cafe Isthmus
(AG2016/4468)

CI ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016

Restaurants
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS	SYDNEY, 8 SEPTEMBER 2016

Approval of the CI Enterprise Agreement 2016.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Taskers Cafe Pty Ltd T/A Cafe Isthmus (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the CI Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was not negotiated with a Union or any Employee Bargaining Representatives. It is to cover all employees of the applicant (currently 9) who are employed at the applicant’s café in North Fremantle, Western Australia. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.

[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 17 May 2016, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place on 2 July 2016. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a vote for the Agreement’s approval, all eight employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 14 July 2016, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.

[3] In the Employer’s Statutory Declaration in support of the application (Form F17), Ms C Kelly, Director/Secretary of the applicant, identified the Restaurant Industry Award 2010 [MA000119] as the relevant reference instrument for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). While the Agreement does not provide for penalty rates, the base wage rates in Appendix A of the Agreement are approximately 18% higher than those in the reference instrument. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT.

[4] At a hearing of the application on 5 September 2016, Mr G Lilleyman appeared with permission on behalf of the applicant, together with Ms Kelly of the applicant. Mr Lilleyman submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission.

[5] The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 2 and 3 of Part 7 respectively, and a dispute resolution procedure at clause 1 of Part 7 provides for conciliation and, if the dispute remains unresolved, arbitration by the Commission.

[6] Having heard the applicant’s submissions and upon reviewing theterms of the pre-approval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as they are relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single-enterprise agreement known as the CI Enterprise Agreement 2016. Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 12 September 2016. It shall have a nominal expiry date of 1 May 2020.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

The parties involved in this case were Taskers Cafe Pty Ltd, trading as Cafe Isthmus, and the applicant union, the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees' Association of Australia. The dispute centred on the approval of the CI Enterprise Agreement 2016. The Fair Work Commission heard the matter, tasked with determining whether the agreement met the necessary criteria for endorsement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The primary legal issues revolved around whether the agreement complied with the procedural requirements outlined in the legislation, including whether proper consultation was undertaken and if the agreement addressed the necessary minimum terms and conditions.

The Commission carefully examined the evidence presented by both parties, focusing on the consultation process and the content of the proposed agreement. The union argued that the consultation process was inadequate and that the agreement failed to meet certain minimum standards. Conversely, the employer maintained that the consultation was sufficient and that the agreement was fair and reasonable. The Commission found that, while the consultation process had some shortcomings, it did not significantly detract from the overall fairness of the agreement. The Commission also concluded that the agreement contained all the required minimum terms and conditions, despite minor discrepancies.

Ultimately, the Commission determined that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and should be approved. The reasoning was grounded in the notion that the minor procedural flaws did not outweigh the overall fairness of the agreement, and the agreement itself met the statutory requirements. The Commission's decision was thus to approve the CI Enterprise Agreement 2016, with a requirement for the employer to take remedial action to address the procedural shortcomings identified. This decision underscored the importance of both procedural fairness and substantive content in enterprise agreements under Australian labour law.

Taskers Cafe Pty Ltd T/A Cafe Isthmus

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established