FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tao Ti Co Pty Limited v A & T Evergood Pty Limited [2003] FCA 1509
TAO TI CO PTY LIMITED (ACN 075 542 915) v A & T EVERGOOD PTY LTD (ACN 085 909 342)
N 1513 OF 2003ALLSOP J
9 DECEMBER 2003
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N1513 of 2003
BETWEEN:
TAO TI CO PTY LIMITED
(ACN 075 542 915)
APPLICANTAND:
A & T EVERGOOD PTY LIMITED
(ACN 085 909 342)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
ALLSOP J
DATE OF ORDER:
9 DECEMBER 2003
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT:
1.DECLARES THAT the respondent has infringed trade mark no 670405.
2.ORDERS THAT the respondent by itself, its servants or agents or otherwise be restrained from using as a trade mark the mark and image of registered trade mark No 670405, being the mark and image annexed hereto.
DIRECTS THAT:
3.the applicant file and serve any evidence and submissions on costs on or before 12 December 2003;
4.the respondent file and serve any evidence and submissions on costs by Friday the 19 December 2003;
5.the applicant file any evidence and submissions on or before 23 December 2003;
6.any party wishing to cross-examine another party will need to inform the Associate to Allsop J no later than 4.00 pm on 24 December; and
7.the applicant notify the respondent of the orders made today and that if an application to set aside these orders is made, that application is to be made on notice and with affidavit material in support on or before 19 December 2003.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
Annexure “A”
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N1513 of 2003
BETWEEN:
TAO TI CO PTY LIMITED
(ACN 075 542 915)
APPLICANTAND:
A & T EVERGOOD PTY LIMITED
(ACN 085 909 342)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
ALLSOP J
DATE:
9 DECEMBER 2003
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The applicant seeks by application filed on 8 October 2003 declaratory and injunctive relief in relation to a trade mark on its goods. The trade mark is two Chinese characters which in English expression is “Tao-Ti”.
I have before me an application for judgment. The respondent has been served with all relevant process. It has been told that judgment will be sought today. The respondent has not appeared on a number of occasions although has appeared on some occasions. No sensible defence has ever been identified or articulated. The Court has received an affidavit from a Mr Cheung sworn 4 December 2003 which seems to indicate that the respondent recognises that it has no defence.
This morning I granted leave to file a notice of motion in Court dated 9 December 2003 which sought four orders including declaratory relief and an order. I have read the affidavit of Hang Yi Li sworn 8 December 2003 and the exhibits to that affidavit have been admitted into evidence.
Mr Lee, solicitor for the applicant, also gave evidence as to the meaning of the word and the face of the bottles which would make clear that the infringing bottles using the absolutely identical trade mark in Chinese characters are used as a trade mark of the green tea bottles.
In these circumstances I am prepared to make a declaration in terms of Order 2 of the Federal Court Rules and an order in terms of Order 3 of the Federal Court Rules as sought in the notice of motion.
I direct that the applicant file and serve any evidence and submissions on costs on or before 12 December 2003.
I order that the respondent file and serve any evidence and submissions on costs by Friday 19 December 2003. The applicant is to file any evidence and submissions on or before 23 December 2003.
Thereafter unless I am notified by either of the parties I will deal with the question of costs on the papers. If any party wishes to cross-examine another party I will need to be informed no later than 4.00 pm on 24 December 2003. In that eventuality I will re-list the matter next year for the hearing of that costs application. If there is no desire to cross-examine any party or to have the matter re-listed for argument I will deal with the order for costs on the papers during the Christmas vacation and deliver judgment when convenient early next year.
I direct the applicant to notify the respondent of the orders I have made today and that if there is any application to set aside these orders, that application is to be made on notice and with affidavit material in support on or before 19 December 2003.
I certify that the preceding nine (9) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Allsop. Associate:
Dated: 18 December 2003
Counsel for the Applicant: A J O’Brien Solicitor for the Applicant: Thomas Chang & Co No appearance by or for the Respondent. Date of Hearing: 9 December 2003 Date of Judgment: 9 December 2003
- AGLC
- Tao Ti Co Pty Limited v A & T Evergood Pty Limited [2003] FCA 1509
- Case
- [2003] FCA 1509
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court addressed the matter on 9 December 2003, noting that the respondent had failed to provide a sensible defence despite multiple opportunities. The court admitted evidence from an affidavit of Hang Yi Li, sworn on 8 December 2003, and also heard from Mr Lee, the solicitor for the applicant, who provided clarification on the meaning of the trade mark and the appearance of the infringing bottles. The court found that the respondent's use of the identical trade mark on their green tea bottles constituted an infringement. Therefore, the court granted the declaratory and injunctive relief sought by the applicant, declaring that the respondent had indeed infringed the trade mark and restraining the respondent from using the contested mark.
The court also outlined the process for determining the costs of the proceedings. The applicant was directed to file and serve any evidence and submissions on costs by 12 December 2003, while the respondent was to do the same by 19 December 2003. Further submissions on costs from the applicant were to be filed by 23 December 2003. If any party wished to cross-examine another, they were required to notify the Associate to Allsop J by 4.00 pm on 24 December 2003. If no such cross-examination was desired, the court would deal with the costs on the papers during the Christmas vacation. Finally, the applicant was instructed to notify the respondent of the orders made and that any application to set aside these orders must be made on notice and supported by affidavit material on or before 19 December 2003.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: ALLSOP J
Full text does not contain this section.