Tao Ti Co Pty Limited v A & T Evergood Pty Limited

Case [2003] FCA 1509


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Tao Ti Co Pty Limited v A & T Evergood Pty Limited [2003] FCA 1509

TAO TI CO PTY LIMITED (ACN 075 542 915) v A & T EVERGOOD PTY LTD (ACN 085 909 342)
N 1513 OF 2003

ALLSOP J
9 DECEMBER 2003
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N1513 of 2003

BETWEEN:

TAO TI CO PTY LIMITED
(ACN 075 542 915)
APPLICANT

AND:

A & T EVERGOOD PTY LIMITED

(ACN 085 909 342)

RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

ALLSOP J

DATE OF ORDER:

9 DECEMBER 2003

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT:

1.DECLARES THAT the respondent has infringed trade mark no 670405.

2.ORDERS THAT the respondent by itself, its servants or agents or otherwise be restrained from using as a trade mark the mark and image of registered trade mark No 670405, being the mark and image annexed hereto.

DIRECTS THAT:

3.the applicant file and serve any evidence and submissions on costs on or before 12 December 2003;

4.the respondent file and serve any evidence and submissions on costs by Friday the 19 December 2003; 

5.the applicant file any evidence and submissions on or before 23 December 2003;

6.any party wishing to cross-examine another party will need to inform the Associate to Allsop J no later than 4.00 pm on 24 December; and

7.the applicant notify the respondent of the orders made today and that if an application to set aside these orders is made, that application is to be made on notice and with affidavit material in support on or before 19 December 2003.

Note:   Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


Annexure “A”


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N1513 of 2003

BETWEEN:

TAO TI CO PTY LIMITED
(ACN 075 542 915)
APPLICANT

AND:

A & T EVERGOOD PTY LIMITED

(ACN 085 909 342)

RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

ALLSOP J

DATE:

9 DECEMBER 2003

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. The applicant seeks by application filed on 8 October 2003 declaratory and injunctive relief in relation to a trade mark on its goods.  The trade mark is two Chinese characters which in English expression is “Tao-Ti”. 

  2. I have before me an application for judgment.  The respondent has been served with all relevant process.  It has been told that judgment will be sought today.  The respondent has not appeared on a number of occasions although has appeared on some occasions.  No sensible defence has ever been identified or articulated.  The Court has received an affidavit from a Mr Cheung sworn 4 December 2003 which seems to indicate that the respondent recognises that it has no defence.

  3. This morning I granted leave to file a notice of motion in Court dated 9 December 2003 which sought four orders including declaratory relief and an order.  I have read the affidavit of Hang Yi Li sworn 8 December 2003 and the exhibits to that affidavit have been admitted into evidence. 

  4. Mr Lee, solicitor for the applicant, also gave evidence as to the meaning of the word and the face of the bottles which would make clear that the infringing bottles using the absolutely identical trade mark in Chinese characters are used as a trade mark of the green tea bottles. 

  5. In these circumstances I am prepared to make a declaration in terms of Order 2 of the Federal Court Rules and an order in terms of Order 3 of the Federal Court Rules as sought in the notice of motion. 

  6. I direct that the applicant file and serve any evidence and submissions on costs on or before 12 December 2003. 

  7. I order that the respondent file and serve any evidence and submissions on costs by Friday 19 December 2003.  The applicant is to file any evidence and submissions on or before 23 December 2003.

  8. Thereafter unless I am notified by either of the parties I will deal with the question of costs on the papers.  If any party wishes to cross-examine another party I will need to be informed no later than 4.00 pm on 24 December 2003.  In that eventuality I will re-list the matter next year for the hearing of that costs application.  If there is no desire to cross-examine any party or to have the matter re-listed for argument I will deal with the order for costs on the papers during the Christmas vacation and deliver judgment when convenient early next year.

  9. I direct the applicant to notify the respondent of the orders I have made today and that if there is any application to set aside these orders, that application is to be made on notice and with affidavit material in support on or before 19 December 2003.

I certify that the preceding nine (9) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Allsop.

Associate:
Dated:            18 December 2003

Counsel for the Applicant: A J O’Brien
Solicitor for the Applicant: Thomas Chang & Co
No appearance by or for the Respondent.
Date of Hearing: 9 December 2003
Date of Judgment: 9 December 2003
Details
AGLC
Tao Ti Co Pty Limited v A & T Evergood Pty Limited [2003] FCA 1509
Case
[2003] FCA 1509
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Tao Ti Co Pty Limited v A & T Evergood Pty Limited was heard by Allsop J in the Federal Court of Australia. The dispute involved a trade mark infringement case, with Tao Ti Co Pty Limited, the applicant, claiming that A & T Evergood Pty Limited, the respondent, had infringed upon their registered trade mark no. 670405. The central issue before the court was whether the respondent had infringed the applicant's trade mark and, if so, what relief should be granted. The applicant sought both declaratory and injunctive relief, asserting that the respondent had used an identical mark on their products, which constituted an infringement.

The court addressed the matter on 9 December 2003, noting that the respondent had failed to provide a sensible defence despite multiple opportunities. The court admitted evidence from an affidavit of Hang Yi Li, sworn on 8 December 2003, and also heard from Mr Lee, the solicitor for the applicant, who provided clarification on the meaning of the trade mark and the appearance of the infringing bottles. The court found that the respondent's use of the identical trade mark on their green tea bottles constituted an infringement. Therefore, the court granted the declaratory and injunctive relief sought by the applicant, declaring that the respondent had indeed infringed the trade mark and restraining the respondent from using the contested mark.

The court also outlined the process for determining the costs of the proceedings. The applicant was directed to file and serve any evidence and submissions on costs by 12 December 2003, while the respondent was to do the same by 19 December 2003. Further submissions on costs from the applicant were to be filed by 23 December 2003. If any party wished to cross-examine another, they were required to notify the Associate to Allsop J by 4.00 pm on 24 December 2003. If no such cross-examination was desired, the court would deal with the costs on the papers during the Christmas vacation. Finally, the applicant was instructed to notify the respondent of the orders made and that any application to set aside these orders must be made on notice and supported by affidavit material on or before 19 December 2003.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

ALLSOP J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: ALLSOP J

Full text does not contain this section.